Image: Peter Haas · CC BY-SA 3.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
Vietjet Seeks Approval to Launch Domestic Flights in Australia with Boeing 737 Fleet
Vietnamese low-cost carrier Vietjet has applied for regulatory approval to start domestic operations in Australia, aiming to base up to 10 Boeing 737 aircraft locally.
The gist
Vietjet is aiming to become Australia's first international low-cost carrier to launch domestic flights in nearly two decades, applying for a local AOC and fleet base.
Vietnamese low-cost airline Vietjet is reportedly preparing to enter the Australian domestic aviation market by establishing a local operating unit. The carrier has applied to Australian regulators for an air operator’s certificate (AOC) and permission to form an Australian-based business entity. This strategic move, if approved, would mark Vietjet as the first international low-cost carrier to launch domestic flights within Australia in almost 20 years.
Industry sources indicate that Vietjet’s proposed Australian unit plans to base a fleet of up to 10 Boeing 737 aircraft to serve domestic routes. Details on the specific destinations the airline intends to operate on have not yet been disclosed, but the size of the planned fleet suggests a significant operational footprint. The application to regulators comes amid indications that the carrier might operate under a new local brand name, separate from the Vietjet identity in Asia.
The move into the Australian domestic market aligns with Vietjet’s expansion strategy in international markets. The airline currently operates international flights from its Vietnamese hubs in Ho Chi Minh City and Hanoi to multiple Australian cities, including Melbourne, Sydney, Perth and Brisbane. Additionally, Vietjet has established subsidiaries in Thailand with Thai Vietjet Air and, more recently, in Kazakhstan through the acquisition of Qazaq Air, rebranded as Vietjet Qazaqstan in 2025.
Slot allocation results for Sydney International Airport have further fueled speculation about Vietjet’s intentions. Over 2,000 slots were reportedly allocated to a new, unnamed entrant, which could correspond to Vietjet’s proposed Australian operation. Such a substantial allocation would provide the carrier with the necessary capacity to launch and sustain competitive domestic flight schedules in key Australian markets.
The last international low-cost carrier to successfully launch domestic operations in Australia was Tigerair Australia. That carrier entered the market in 2007 and was owned by Singapore-based Tiger Airways. Tigerair Australia operated a fleet of Airbus A320s before being acquired by Virgin Australia in 2014. The airline ceased operations in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic’s severe impact on air travel.
In the years since Tigerair Australia’s exit, the Australian domestic market has seen entries and exits of new carriers. One notable example is Bonza, a low-cost operator that launched in 2022 but was forced to cease operations in late 2023 amid financial difficulties. The failure of such entrants underscores the challenging economics of the Australian domestic aviation sector, emphasizing the importance of scale and prudent management.
If Vietjet succeeds in establishing its Australian subsidiary, it would represent a significant development for the domestic market's competitive landscape. A fresh international-backed low-cost operator could increase competition on routes dominated by incumbents such as Qantas and its affiliate Jetstar, as well as Virgin Australia. Vietjet’s existing international presence in Australia may provide a platform for feeder traffic and seamless connectivity between domestic and international flights.
The carrier’s plan to utilize Boeing 737 aircraft is noteworthy given the type’s widespread use in the Australian domestic fleet. Operating a common aircraft family aligns well with current infrastructure and maintenance capabilities and offers operational efficiencies. Vietjet’s ability to leverage its experience with 737 operations in other markets may improve its prospects for a successful launch.
With Vietjet’s application currently under consideration, its Australian domestic launch will hinge on regulatory approval and favorable market conditions. The outcome will be closely monitored by industry stakeholders given the implications for competition, consumer choice, and the broader evolution of the Australian aviation sector.
Read more
All Regulatory →
Pilatus inaugurates $123M Schwarzhorn composite manufacturing center in Nidwalden
Pilatus has opened a new CHF 100 million ($123 million) composite manufacturing center in Switzerland as it prepares to expand the use of the lighter-weight materials in future aircraft. The new "Schwarzhorn" building in the Swiss canton of Nidwalden brings Pilatus' composite development and production operations together under one roof for the first time. The facility provides workspaces for about 300 employees. Pilatus CEO Markus Bucher said the project represents the company's largest investment in a single new facility to date. Pilatus has used fiber-reinforced composite materials for more than 40 years, although their use was traditionally limited to non-load-bearing parts such as covers and cowlings. That changed with the PC-24 twinjet, which uses composites in primary structures including load-bearing control surfaces. The lighter structures help reduce aircraft weight and fuel consumption, and Pilatus said it plans to increase its use of composites in the future. The Schwarzhorn facility handles the full production process, starting with delivery and storage of raw materials and continuing through component manufacturing, subassembly and surface treatment. Finished component kits can then be sent directly to final assembly. Pilatus said the manufacturing areas were also designed to accommodate new production and inspection technologies and greater automation in the future. Bringing engineering and manufacturing teams into the same facility is intended to improve cooperation between the two groups. "With this building, Pilatus is once again reaffirming its commitment to Switzerland as a place of innovation, manufacturing, and training," Bucher said. The facility also incorporates photovoltaic panels on its roof and facades, while waste heat from production processes and groundwater are used for heating and cooling. Pilatus is seeking LEED Platinum certification for the building, which would be a first for the company. The Schwarzhorn name refers both to a Swiss mountain and to the dark color of the composite components produced there.
Italy Seizes Multiple Foreign-Registered GA Aircraft Amid Intensified Customs Enforcement
Italian authorities have seized several foreign-registered general aviation aircraft in recent months as the country's financial police increase customs and tax enforcement at airports. One case involves an N-registered Mooney M20K that was seized at Trento Airport April 9 and had not been released when German aviation publication Aerokurier reported on the case in late June. The aircraft's owner said his attorney was handling eight seizure cases and knew of roughly 30 similar cases across Italy. The Mooney was imported into Europe in 1988, initially carried German registration and was transferred to the FAA registry after an ownership change in 2006, according to Aerokurier . The aircraft subsequently remained based in Europe for approximately two decades. “Italian customs demanded documents relating to the aircraft’s import, including customs clearance, that were no more than six months old—which, naturally, cannot be provided, as the aircraft has been based in Europe for decades,” the owner told Aerokurier in a statement translated from German. The publication also reported that an N-registered Cirrus owned by a French pilot was seized after a weather diversion to Pescara. Foreign Registrations Under Scrutiny AOPA Germany issued a warning on July 9, stating that the Guardia di Finanza has increased inspections involving foreign-registered aircraft, particularly those carrying U.S. N-numbers, San Marino T7 registrations and Swiss HB registrations. Authorities are reportedly examining ownership, tax and customs status and aircraft use. Company-owned aircraft can receive additional scrutiny over whether flights are private or constitute commercial transportation. AOPA Germany said increased enforcement has been particularly noticeable in northeastern Italy. The dispute also involves aircraft that have already been imported into the European Union . In the Mooney case, the owner says Italian authorities are questioning whether the aircraft retained its EU customs status after it moved from a German registration to the FAA registry. The owner disputes that interpretation and has filed complaints with the European Commission. AOPA Germany says AOPA Italy and European IAOPA are also challenging the enforcement and that several legal proceedings are pending. Pilots Urged To Prepare The cases do not mean every foreign or U.S.-registered aircraft entering Italy will face seizure. Even so, AOPA Germany advises caution. “Extreme caution is currently advised when flying to Italy,” AOPA Germany said in its July warning. “If the aircraft is not registered to a private individual as owner and operator in an EU member state, you should check the current regulations and, if in doubt, choose a different destination.”
Understanding EC261: Europe's Comprehensive Flight Delay and Cancellation Compensation
The European Union has the most consumer friendly policies when it comes to what passengers are entitled to in the event that their flight is significantly delayed or canceled. For example, if your long haul flight is delayed by at least four hours, you could be entitled to 600 Euro cash, which is huge. In this post, I'd like to go over everything you need to know about how this policy works. What is EC261 flight delay & cancelation compensation? Regulation EC261/2004 (EC261 for short, though often incorrectly referred to as EU261) is the European Union's official rule that dictates what airlines owe passengers in the event of flight delays or cancelations. This can include everything from cash compensation, to hotels, to meal vouchers. This is truly the most generous protection you'll find anywhere in the world when it comes to airline passenger rights. Europe flight delay & cancelation compensation rules Under what circumstances are you entitled to compensation in Europe if your flight is delayed or canceled? As you might expect, this can be difficult to understand at times, since rules differ based on the airline you're flying with, the cause of the delay, etc. In this post I'll go over all the details. Which airlines & countries are covered by EC261? EC261 rules apply in the following situations: If you are traveling from a European Union airport on any airline If you are traveling to a European Union airport on a European Union-based airline In other words: If you're flying from Frankfurt to Newark, EC261 would apply regardless of whether you're traveling with Lufthansa or United If you're flying from Newark to Frankfurt, EC261 would only apply on Lufthansa, and not on United (since United isn't a European Union-based airline) A few more things to note: Even though Norway and Switzerland aren't in the European Union, EC261 applies for these countries as well; furthermore, the United Kingdom has separate rules that are almost identical to EC261 You're only eligible for EC261 coverage if you have a confirmed reservation, and are traveling on a revenue or award ticket (in other words, staff travel or other industrial discount tickets don't qualify) Frustratingly, EC261 doesn't apply if you're merely connecting in the European Union between two other destinations; for example, it wouldn't apply to a New York to Paris to Johannesburg itinerary EC261 also potentially applies on non-EU airlines How much money is EC261 compensation? The amount of cash compensation you're entitled to under EC261 varies based on the length of the flight… sort of: If your flight covers a distance of under 1,500km (930 miles), you're entitled to 250 Euro compensation if you're delayed by at least three hours If your flight covers a distance of 1,500-3,500km (930-2,200 miles), you're entitled to 400 Euro compensation if you're delayed by at least three hours If your flight covers a distance of over 3,500km (2,200 miles), you're entitled to 600 Euro compensation if you're delayed by at least four hours So as you can see, the longer the flight, the longer the delay has to be in order to get compensated. However, you're also potentially going to get more compensation. There are a couple more details to be aware of: A delay is calculated based on the time that you arrive at your gate and the doors open, rather than based on when you touch down at your destination Furthermore, the delay is calculated based on how late you reach your final destination; if you're flying from Berlin to Frankfurt to New York, and your Berlin to Frankfurt flight is delayed by an hour and that causes you to miss your connecting flight and arrive in New York at least four hours late, you'd be entitled to cash compensation EC261 compensation can get you up to 600 Euro Which delays qualify for EC261 compensation? If you're looking for compensation through EC261, you're entitled to that for any delay or cancelation that isn't due to "extraordinary circumstances." The issue is that this can be a bit of a gray area, and airlines have been known to play games. That's because what constitutes "extraordinary circumstances" isn't explicitly defined. As a general rule of thumb: Weather delays, air traffic control delays, delays due to strikes outside the airline, delays due to political instability, diversions due to medical issues or unruly passengers, etc., would be considered extraordinary circumstances, so EC261 compensation wouldn't apply A mechanical problem, a late inbound aircraft, a crew related delay, a strike directly at the airline, etc., wouldn't be considered extraordinary circumstances, so EC261 compensation would apply Extraordinary circumstances aren't eligible for compensation Do flight cancelations qualify for EC261 compensation? Not only does the above compensation apply if your flight is delayed, but it also applies if it's canceled. EC261 compensation applies in the event that your flight is canceled within 14 days of departure. If your flight is canceled further out than that, then the compensation wouldn't apply. Furthermore, as is the case with delays, extraordinary circumstances are excluded from being eligible for compensation. Flight cancelations also qualify for EC261 compensation How do you claim EC261 compensation? Claiming EC261 compensation is potentially the tricky part, as airlines often do everything in their power to get out of paying this compensation. There are two general ways you can approach this: You can contact the airline to try to claim EC261 compensation, and some airlines have forms on their websites through which this can be done You can use a third party service that helps consumers with this, though they usually take a significant cut; I've never used one of these so can't personally vouch for any, but you can easily find them online I'd always recommend doing everything in your power to request the compensation directly, so you can keep the entire amount. If you're going to claim EC261 compensation, there are a few things to keep in mind: This isn't something you need to do at the airport, so don't take this up with airport staff, but rather take it up with customer relations after the fact I'd recommend keeping as much documentation as possible, including taking pictures of the flight status page reflecting the delay, keeping boarding passes, etc. Expect that airlines may try to do everything in their power to get out of paying this compensation; this can include claiming that there were "extraordinary circumstances," just not responding for a long time, etc. You can claim EC261 compensation directly with an airline Does EC261 cover hotels & meals? Not only does EC261 offer cash compensation in the event of a delay or cancelation, but it also offers passengers other forms of assistance, including: Hotel accommodation in the event of an overnight delay, including transport to and from the hotel Meals and refreshments Two telephone calls or emails This should be offered proactively in the event of a significant delay or cancelation. There's no promise of how efficiently any of this will be offered, though. For example, if you have a flight canceled at an outstation (non-hub airport), you might have two agents trying to work on hotels for hundreds of passengers, which could take hours. So be prepared to be patient. In many cases you can also just book your own hotel and then be reimbursed after the fact, though in some cases airlines may have a cap on how much they're willing to reimburse, and it can be tough to know that in advance. What's also nice is that the duty of care applies even if the delay or cancelation is due to extraordinary circumstances. So if your flight is delayed overnight due to weather, you'd still be owed a hotel room and meals. EC261 compensation should also cover hotels What does EC261 say about rebooking flights? In the event that your flight is substantially delayed or canceled, EC261 requires that airlines rebook passen
Swiss startup PeakJet launches semi-private flights connecting Zurich to Mallorca
The semi-private flight concept has been popular in the United States for quite some time. Companies like JSX and Aero appear to have found the sweet spot between commercial and executive aviation, rising, as well, an upward trend in premium travel demand. Could this concept work in Europe, as well? A new Swiss platform called PeakJet has set out to find out. Set up by a group of experienced airline executives, PeakJet is betting that there is space in the European market for a service capable of offering an experience similar to executive flying at a price point which isn't out of whack with the typical business class fare. On August 1, 2026, coinciding with Switzerland's national day, PeakJet completed its first flight between Zurich (ZRH) and Palma de Mallorca (PMI). The flight was operated by VistaJet Gmbh (the German subsidiary of the well-known executive aviation group) using Embraer 650 Legacy. This is a key element in PeakJet's business model, since the startup doesn't hold its own air operator certificate (AOC). PeakJet acts as a platform, defining the value proposition and deploying capacity to those markets with latent demand for this type of service. At the helm of this project is Gianni Tronza, a Swiss executive with decades of experience across the industry who has held senior executive roles at airlines such as Etihad Airways, American Airlines, British Airways and Crossair, the kernel of what later became SWISS. Also backing this project is Peter Baumgartner, former Chief Executive Officer (CEO) at Etihad Airways, as well as a partner in several other entrepreneurial projects in Switzerland. AeroTime spoke with both PeakJet founders ahead of the airline's launch to find out more about the idea behind it and its main drivers and objectives. The first idea that came up was that of flexibility and modularity. PeakJet has been built as an asset-light platform capable to scale up easily and allocate premium capacity to a growing premium demand In this regard, the US experience looms large. Tronza mentioned how he was particularly inspired by Aero, one of the companies that have been sprung up in the US shared private flight market and which serves mostly upmarket leisure destinations. The other thing PeakJet founders noticed is that there is a lot of available capacity in the executive aviation market, since the typical private jet is only in operation 40% of the time. The missing piece, Tronza explained, was the technology to connect this capacity with demand at regular schedules and optimize pricing dynamically. This is why most of the investment to launch PeakJet has been focused on developing these technological capabilities in-house. So far, the flights are operated by Vista Jet, although Tronza and Baumgartner said that an essential part of the model is to have a portfolio operators on the platform as PeakJet grows. eVTOLs and helicopters may soon be added to the mix, as well, since these alternative modes of air transportation can be complementary of PeakJet's core business, helping get passengers across the last miles to their final destinations. PeakJet's value proposition Two elements are central to the value proposition, though, one of them is the clear orientation towards the premium market, the other is the focus on the short-haul, defined as flights of up to 2.5 hours. Second home owners is one of the key demographics that PeakJet is targeting, hence the initial choice of routes, linking Zurich to Mallorca, Nice (NCE) and Malaga (AGP). Other cities and market may be added at later dates, both executives confirmed. The fact that European full-service airlines continue to show strong demand for premium services, even when many of them have been offering an increasingly bare-bones business class in short-haul, is seen by PeakJet's founders as an encouraging sign. At the same time, they appear confident that there is significant latent demand for premium leisure travel services which is ready to indulge in this type of service he moment it comes across the right value proposition. As an example, Baumgartner mentioned how starting fees on routes such as Zurich to Nice and Mallorca are in the 990 to 1400 CHF (US$1,100 to 1,700 approximately), which are broadly comparable to business class fares on the same routes. The difference, though, is that PeakJet aims to offer an experience much closer to that of private flying. What has, then, prevented this business model from taking root in Europe? Worth noting that at least two US-based operators, Surf Air and Aero, tried, and failed, in the last few years. Tronza attributed the withdrawal of those companies from the European market to a combination of factors. The Swiss executive noted how Brexit and the pandemic happened in that time-frame, but, perhaps more importantly, those operators made a conscious choice to focus on the booming US market. Tronza also highlighted the differences between what PeakJet offers and executive aviation, a segment of the industry which has seen several marketplaces spring up in the last few years. "We fly regular routes offering prices that are way lower than the typical private jet cost, while offering way more value than the typical European business class. Our value proposition is that you get a premium experience, save time and enjoy travel at a price point that is accessible to many." he stated. Tronza also revealed that besides the flying, PeakJet has also plans to leverage the technology platform it is building in order to offer packages and ancillary services further on. A loyalty program is also on the cards. Will PeakJet bring about the coming of age of semi-private aviation in Europe? The ingredients are there: real latent demand, an asset-light model built for quick scaling, and an experienced team. The ball is now in the travelers' court. RELATED Magnifica Air co-founder shares more details about the new US premium airline
The Daily Touch & Go
The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.