Illustration: The Touch & Go
Dual Boards Clash Over Chattanooga Airport Control After New Tennessee Law
A new Tennessee law changes the appointment of Chattanooga Airport's governing board, leading to competing local and state-appointed boards both claiming authority.
The gist
Chattanooga Airport control dispute pits local and new state-appointed boards against each other following recent state legislation.
Tennessee’s recent legislation has triggered a governance battle over Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport, resulting in two competing boards asserting control. The law, effective July 1, alters how airport authorities are appointed in Chattanooga and four other Tennessee regions, shifting majority appointment power to state officials. This change has spawned parallel boards: the existing local board and a newly constituted state-appointed board, each claiming operational authority over the airport.
The statute affects airport authorities in Chattanooga, Nashville, Memphis, Knoxville, and the Tri-Cities, transferring majority board appointments to the governor plus the speakers of the state House and Senate. Chattanooga retains three appointment slots on the new nine-member board but has so far declined to fill them. This state takeover is linked to its increased financial investment, according to state Senator Todd Gardenhire, the legislation’s sponsor. He argued that with greater state funding, the state deserves greater governance input.
However, Chattanooga officials and the sitting local airport board dispute the law’s legitimacy and implications, filing lawsuits in both state and federal courts to block the governance shift. The federal lawsuit specifically petitions the FAA to continue recognizing the locally appointed board during the ongoing dispute, emphasizing the importance of stable airport operations. Mayor Tim Kelly expressed concerns that state-appointed members from outside Chattanooga might pursue agendas counter to local interests, highlighting a mismatch between state funding and board seat allocation.
Despite ongoing legal challenges, the new state-appointed Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport Authority board voted unanimously to withdraw from the city’s lawsuit demanding retention of the local board. The state-appointed board argues it assumed control legally when the law took effect since no court order blocked the statute’s implementation. Board Chair Shannon Burger cited fiscal prudence in ceasing the litigation to avoid further airport expenditures on unresolved litigation.
FAA recognition remains a critical point of contention. A spokesperson for the state-appointed board noted that the FAA currently continues to recognize the local board but is expected to make a final decision by July 27 on which entity will be acknowledged for federal aviation matters. This recognition determines which board has the authority to sign off on federal grants and regulatory compliance, impacting the airport’s funding and operations.
This governance dispute emerges amid broader national scrutiny of airport authority structures, which often balance local stakeholder interests against state and federal funding dependencies. Chattanooga’s situation exemplifies the challenges in reconciling local autonomy with increasing state-level financial involvement. The airport, a critical regional hub, must maintain operational stability while legal and political wrangling persists.
Historically, Chattanooga’s airport has been governed locally with community-appointed board members. The law’s shift to state majority appointment is a significant change in power dynamics, reflecting Tennessee’s strategic interest in its key airports’ governance. The conflict also highlights the FAA’s vital role in arbitrating authority recognition amidst jurisdictional disputes, ensuring that airport operation and funding comply with federal aviation policies.
At stake are not only control and governance but also the continued investment and development of Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport. The outcome will set precedents for other Tennessee airports facing similar board restructuring. The FAA’s impending decision will clarify which board carries the federal imprimatur necessary for airport administration during this contentious period.
Frequently asked questions
- What caused the governance dispute at Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport?
- A new Tennessee law changed the appointment process for the airport’s governing board, shifting majority control from local to state-appointed members, leading to competing boards.
- Which authorities appoint the new Chattanooga airport board members under the recent law?
- The governor and the speakers of the Tennessee House and Senate appoint a majority of the members on the new nine-member board for Chattanooga Metropolitan Airport.
- What is the FAA's role in the ongoing Chattanooga airport control conflict?
- The FAA currently recognizes the locally appointed board but plans to decide by July 27 which board it will officially acknowledge for federal aviation matters, crucial for funding and regulation.
Read more
All Regulatory →
Delta to Launch Los Angeles-Manila Flights in March 2027 with Airbus A350
Historically, Delta Air Lines has shied away from ultra long haul flights, with a limited number of exceptions. However, that's slowly starting to change. Delta recently launched flights to Hong Kong (HKG) , and Riyadh (RUH) flights are expected soon as well. A few months back, Delta revealed in a regulatory filing that it plans to launch yet another route to Asia. Last week I wrote about how an announcement was imminent. Well, that has now been confirmed, as Delta has today unveiled details of its newest long haul route. Delta confirms March 2027 launch for flights to Manila Delta plans to launch nonstop flights between Los Angeles (LAX) and Manila (MNL) as of March 27, 2027. The flight will initially operate 3x weekly, before switching to daily as of June 7, 2027. Specifically, the flight is expected to operate with the following schedule: DL181 Los Angeles to Manila departing 11:50PM arriving 5:30AM (+2 days) DL180 Manila to Los Angeles departing 7:40AM arriving 6:05AM Delta plans to fly from Los Angeles to Manila The 7,305-mile flight will be operated by an Airbus A350-900, featuring the carrier's latest cabin products. The flight is blocked at 14hr40min westbound and 13hr25min eastbound. We've officially had a clue that this route would be added since October 2025, when a Delta executive revealed to employees internally that the airline plans to add flights to Singapore (SIN) and Manila (MNL). So while the Singapore service remains to be seen, the Manila flights are becoming a reality. LAX-MNL flights departing Manila at 7:40 A.M. will arrive in Los Angeles at 6:05 A.M. on the same day, while return flights will depart Los Angeles at 11:50 P.M. and arrive in Manila at 5:30 A.M. two days after departure. https://t.co/b37BKT8Dpm — JonNYC (@xJonNYC) July 17, 2026 I'm curious to see how Delta's Asia growth strategy plays out It's an interesting time for Delta when it comes to its Asia network: Historically, Delta's Asia network has been based so heavily around routing passengers through Seoul Incheon (ICN) with connections on joint venture partner Korean Air, which means Delta's actual list of nonstop Asia destinations has been very limited With Delta now taking delivery of a good number of long haul planes, including new "flagship" Airbus A350-1000 aircraft , the airline has big growth aspirations for the plane Delta's West Coast strategy has been a challenge — for a while we saw the airline growing in Seattle (SEA), setting that up as a transpacific gateway, but that airport is pretty maxed out in terms of capacity, and Delta is in the number two spot behind Alaska ; now we're seeing Delta try to grow greatly in Los Angeles (LAX) , which the airline sees as a "once in a generation" opportunity Los Angeles is probably the most competitive West Coast market among Asian carriers, and capacity is seemingly endless, and as a result, yields can be really rough; that's why none of the "big three" carriers have been able to achieve a dominant position at the airport I'm excited to see Delta's long haul network get more interesting, but there's no denying this strategy also faces some challenges. For one, US carriers have among the highest operating costs in the world for ultra long haul flights, given labor costs at US airlines. Beyond that, it's hard for Delta to be the leader across the Pacific, when they're competing against United, which not only has a very well established network, but also has a mega hub in San Francisco (SFO), which has a scale that Delta simply can't replicate in Los Angeles or Seattle. The Manila route specifically is also interesting, given that Philippine Airlines is joining the oneworld alliance , so might become a more competitive option for some. For that matter, the airline is also improving its passenger experience in premium cabins, with new planes and seats . United also added San Francisco to Manila flights in late 2023, though United is also a lot further along when it comes to the size of its Asia route network, and San Francisco is also a much bigger hub for the airline. So we'll see how this situation evolves. Admittedly airline economics have changed over the years, and routes no longer need to be wildly profitable directly, but instead, loyalty programs are also a big consideration. But still, I'm curious to see how this whole Asia network growth plays out for Delta. Can Delta make money flying from Los Angeles to Manila? Bottom line Delta plans to launch nonstop flights between Los Angeles and Manila as of late March 2027. The flight will initially operate 3x weekly, before moving to daily within a few weeks. Delta will use an Airbus A350 for the service, as it does for all of its Asia routes. Frankly, I'm excited to see Delta grow across the Pacific, given that United basically had Asia to itself among the "big three" US carriers, in terms of the size of its network. However, I'm just not convinced that Delta has a winning strategy here, at least in terms of this being profitable in the long run. What do you make of Delta's Manila plans?
FAA Restores Boeing's Authority to Certify 737 MAX and 787 Deliveries
The Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA ) has finally returned authority to Boeing to certify airworthiness certificates again on select Boeing 737 MAX and Boeing 787 family of aircraft. This comes after the permissions were revoked in 2019, following the fatal MAX crashes .
Frontier Airlines Faces Two Class Actions After Cyberattack Exposes Data of Over 11,000
Two proposed class actions say Frontier failed to protect employee and customer data after an unauthorized party accessed a storage account. Regulators list 11,482 affected people, while a ransomware group claims credit—but the cases still have a major standing problem.
FAA Restores Boeing's Authority to Certify New 737 MAX and 787 Jets
Starting July 20, Boeing will again issue final airworthiness certificates for newly built 737 MAX and 787 aircraft—authority the FAA reserved after fatal crashes and production failures. The agency says eight months of alternating inspections produced comparable quality findings, while federal audits and production oversight will continue.
The Daily Touch & Go
The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.