Illustration: The Touch & Go
CoachAir CEO Details Digital Infrastructure Vital for Advancing Advanced Air Mobility
Jacob Baumler of CoachAir emphasizes that automated compliance verification and operational intelligence are critical to scaling safe, legal Advanced Air Mobility flights.
The gist
CoachAir CEO highlights that automated digital trust systems are essential to safely scaling Advanced Air Mobility operations.
Continuing coverage
All Advanced Air Mobility →Jacob Baumler, founder and CEO of CoachAir, outlined the critical role of digital infrastructure in the future of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM), stressing that beyond aircraft innovation, operational trust and regulatory compliance must be automated at scale. CoachAir specializes in verifying the legality and operational readiness of private charter flights using digital tools that ensure compliance and secure transaction management for part 135 operations and emerging AAM ventures. Baumler emphasized that as AAM progresses beyond demonstration flights into thousands of daily operations, manual oversight will be insufficient to maintain safety and regulatory standards.
Central to Baumler’s argument is that automated verification workflows can validate every mission’s compliance status before funds are transferred and monitor operational status through completion of flight. This continuous process, CoachAir’s platform models, reduces risk and increases transparency for operators, regulators, airports, and passengers alike. By creating immutable audit trails of compliance and payment, the digital infrastructure builds public confidence that safety and legality are assured on each mission.
Baumler pointed out that current AAM industry focus has skewed heavily toward aircraft certification, propulsion systems, and integration into controlled airspace. While these technical developments are essential, he argued that the supporting ecosystem—including identity verification, secure payments, maintenance tracking, and cybersecurity—needs rapid maturation as well. CoachAir’s approach is to build an interwoven aviation intelligence network connecting all stakeholders, enabling real-time data exchange and regulatory adherence.
Drawing perspective from the established Part 135 charter sector, Baumler highlighted that operational discipline and comprehensive regulatory compliance are foundational to aviation safety. The lessons learned from decades of manifold compliance challenges suggest that AAM operators can leverage technology to facilitate procedural rigor rather than circumvent it. Automation should reinforce experienced operator judgment to sustain aviation’s safety culture while decreasing administrative burden.
Transparency and data integrity emerge as pivotal for public and regulatory trust in AAM, according to Baumler. Passengers base their confidence not solely on the aircraft’s innovation, but on the demonstrable compliance of the entire operation. Transparent compliance records and continuous operational intelligence provide regulators enhanced oversight capabilities, investors solid risk mitigation, and end users assurance regarding safety standards.
Looking at the digital transaction flow itself, CoachAir's verification-before-payment model mitigates fraud and operational errors by confirming all regulatory and safety requirements upfront. Their platform's ability to securely manage transactions from booking through flight completion aims to standardize trust in a sector prone to fragmentation. Such standardization may prove indispensable as AAM scales from early adopters to mainstream commercial transportation.
Baumler warns that without this foundational digital trust infrastructure, scaling AAM safely will be unattainable as high-frequency operations demand synchronized compliance and payment verification on a continuous basis. He contrasts the current disconnected, manual processes with a future in which intelligent systems autonomously validate mission legality, operator credentials, airworthiness, and financial transactions in real-time.
The broader implication Baumler presents is that technology investing predominantly in the aircraft itself misses the crucial systems that underpin safe, scalable commercial service. Regulatory modernization is occurring, but without parallel advances in digital compliance and operational intelligence platforms, the promise of AAM to transform urban and regional mobility remains constrained by operational risks and inconsistent public trust.
CoachAir's ongoing development underscores a growing industry recognition that successful Advanced Air Mobility commercialization will depend equally on these invisible but vital digital frameworks that verify operational eligibility and enable transparent, secure commerce throughout the flight lifecycle. This integrated approach could set new benchmarks for aviation safety and reliability as the sector rapidly advances.
Read more
All Aviation Safety →
Garmin Launches Axis Flight Displays Tailored for Certified Piston Aircraft
Garmin on Wednesday unveiled a new family of flight displays designed for piston-powered aircraft called Axis . Axis is designed to work with certified piston-powered singles and twins though an AML STC (Approved Model List Supplemental Type Certificate) covering hundreds of models. The integrated avionics system is also available for experimental and light sport aircraft. Axis is designed for maximum safety and efficiency, according to Garmin. The flight displays can include a built-in IFR GPS, nav/comm radio, and audio panel capability, which reduces aircraft weight and simplifies installation. Axis is compatible with many of the same navigators, radios, modules, and sensors as Garmin's popular G3X Touch flight displays, and features an easy upgrade path, using the same panel cutouts and mounting points. READ MORE: Garmin Opens Mesa Gateway Location READ MORE: Garmin's Autoland Passes First Real-World Test "Axis redefines Garmin's flight display portfolio and brings industry-first capability to a single flight display," said Carl Wolf, Garmin vice president of aviation sales, marketing, programs and support, in a news release. "This game-changing flight display system delivers a modern, highly capable cockpit experience while significantly reducing time, complexity and cost of installation through integration of navigation, communication, and audio functions into a single flight display. The visual design elements and crisp user interface bring together decades of Garmin innovation in a familiar yet modern design. "Axis sets the new standard for what pilots can expect from an integrated flight display system." Axis Family Since there is no such thing as a standard panel, the Axis displays come in multiple sizes— 11.6-inch landscape, 8-inch portrait, and 8-inch landscape. Each includes highly responsive touchscreen displays as well as physical controls for quick access to key functions. Garmin has a well-earned reputation for safety-minded innovation. Axis incorporates the company's Smart Glide, Runway Occupancy Awareness (ROA), and optional SurfaceWatch runway monitoring technology to help pilots manage emergencies and reduce risk. Designed to simplify avionics upgrades and reduce installation costs, Axis offers a streamlined upgrade path from G3X Touch, leveraging many of the same sensors, modules, panel cutouts, and mounting points while integrating multiple avionics functions into one display. According to Garmin, the Axis 11.6-inch flight displays have achieved FAA/EASA Technical Standard Order (TSO) and will be available in July. The 8-inch displays are expected to be available in early 2027. The FAA STC will cover hundreds of models of certified Part 23 Class I/II piston singles and twins. Each display can be configured as a primary flight display (PFD) or multi-function display (MFD) with an optional engine indication system (EIS). The displays can be kept full screen or appear split screen, depending on what the pilot wants.The flight displays are configurable for both experimental as well as certified aircraft. The Axis 11.6 is available with a TSO-certified IFR GPS, comm radio, nav radio, and audio panel all built into a single unit. The VHF comm radio offers 10 watts of transmit power, supports 8.33 kHz frequency tuning and standby comm monitoring. This enables pilots to monitor a standby frequency while staying tuned to the active ATC frequency. The built-in, four-place intercom audio panel includes dual-comm switching with support for one external radio, comm playback, and Bluetooth capability for music and phone calls. The Axis 11.6 is available in three certified variants. The base version offers a PFD/MFD, while the GPS/comm and GPS/nav/comm models include an IFR GPS and integrated audio panel. Experimental and LSA aircraft can leverage both certified and non-TSO versions of the 11.6-inch displays. The unit offers enhanced situational awareness on the PFD, including primary flight data, as well as the horizontal situation indicator (HSI), which can include an embedded map or traffic view, depending on pilot preference. Widgets provide additional situational awareness on the PFD by displaying three compact views of MFD functions, including map, flight plan, weather, and traffic. Enhanced Synthetic Vision Technology (SVT) provides 3D depictions of terrain, obstacles, runway and taxiway markings, allowing for pilots to more clearly interpret their surroundings. Pathway rectangles will help pilots to visualize the highway in the sky, depicting their flight path, including en route legs, flight track, and course intercepts. 3D SafeTaxi provides pilots with a three-dimensional, exocentric view of the airport environment directly on the PFD. This provides a clear, localized picture of taxiways, runways, hangars, and surrounding buildings, helping the pilot who is unfamiliar with the airport avoid confusion. The MFD features dynamic mapping, ADS-B traffic, weather, waypoint information, including terminal charts and an expanded Electronic Instrument System (EIS). Additionally, an HDMI video input on each display allows for live-camera video monitoring. A dedicated emergency button is located on the display bezel, allowing pilots to quickly access emergency procedure options such as the activation of Smart Glide in the event of an uncommanded loss of engine power. SmartGilde efficiently navigates to an airport within range. If the aircraft is equipped with either a Garmin GFC 500 or GFC 600 autopilot, the system can auto-engage to fly the aircraft en route. Axis also comes with advanced engine monitoring. The EIS (Engine Information System) uses large, prominent engine gauges with color-coded pointers and data bands that indicate normal operating ranges, cautions and exceedances. Bar gauges display numerical values for additional precision. With an interface adapter and sensors, Axis can serve as the primary EIS display in piston-powered aircraft equipped with most normally aspirated or turbocharged 4- to 6-cylinder engines, plus radial and turbine-powered experimental aircraft . After landing this information can be automatically uploaded to flyGarmin.com via the Garmin Pilot app or the GDL 60 datalink and PlaneSync service. Pilots can optionally choose to share these logs with analysis services such as FlySto or SavvyAviation to gain deeper insights on engine health, maintenance updates, flight analysis, and more. You can stay connected both socially and with aviation weather services while you fly, as Axis has built-in Wi-Fi and Bluetooth to allow pilots to connect with Garmin Pilot in flight as well as share GPS, traffic, weather, and flight plans. A built-in USB-C data port supports data transfer capabilities like downloading databases and offloading flight logs. The USB-C port will also support device charging up to 27 watts. Additionally, Database Concierge allows pilots to download updates to their Garmin Pilot app and wirelessly transfer to their compatible avionics via a compatible mobile device. Axis and CubCrafters CubCrafters, the makers of rugged backcountry aircraft, announced it is one of the first companies to incorporate Garmin's Axis integrated flight display system into its aircraft. According to Brad Damm, CubCrafters vice president, the Axis lineup can be added to both for factory-new aircraft and those that come in for a retrofit. In a news release Damm noted the collaboration took 18 months of engineering to make the advanced technology available to CubCrafters pilots.
Dan-Air Flight 1008 Crashes Into Tenerife Mountain Killing All 146 Onboard
On 25 April 1980, tragedy struck one of Britain’s best-known independent airlines when a Dan-Air London Boeing 727 crashed into a mountainside while approaching Tenerife in the Canary Islands. The loss of Flight 1008 claimed the lives of all 146 passengers and crew on board, making it the deadliest accident in Dan-Air’s history and one of the worst aviation disasters involving a British airline at the time. A Holiday Flight to Tenerife The accident aircraft. Photo: Rob Hodgkins Dan-Air Flight 1008 was a charter service from Manchester to Tenerife North Airport (then known as Los Rodeos), carrying 138 holidaymakers and eight crew aboard a Boeing 727-46 registered G-BDAN. Built in 1966, the trijet had joined Dan-Air’s fleet in 1974 after earlier service in the United States. By 1980 it had accumulated more than 30,000 flying hours and was one of several Boeing 727s that had joined the airline. The flight across the Bay of Biscay and into the Canary Islands was routine. Weather around Tenerife, however, was less forgiving. Low cloud obscured the mountainous interior of the island, requiring aircraft to rely entirely on instrument procedures during their approach. Confusion During the Approach As Flight 1008 neared Tenerife North, it was sequenced behind a slower Iberia aircraft. Air traffic control instructed the Dan-Air crew to enter a holding pattern near the airport before commencing their approach. The problem was that this was not one of the published holding procedures available on the crew’s approach charts. Although the instructions were acknowledged, ambiguity over exactly how the hold should be flown soon led to a fatal navigational error. Instead of remaining clear of the island’s mountainous terrain, the Boeing 727 drifted towards high ground while descending. Unaware of the developing danger, the aircraft continued descending after being cleared to 5,000 feet—an altitude that was safe for the intended procedure, but not for the path the aircraft had actually taken. A Desperate Final Attempt Moments later, the Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) sounded, warning the crew that terrain lay directly ahead. The pilots immediately applied full power and attempted to climb away from danger. However, believing they were in a different position to where they actually were, the captain initiated a steep right turn. At 13:21 local time, the Boeing 727 struck the forested slopes of Mount La Esperanza while still in cloud. The aircraft broke apart on impact and was destroyed. There were no survivors. What Caused the Crash? The official Spanish investigation concluded that the accident was a classic example of Controlled Flight Into Terrain (CFIT), where an aircraft under full control is inadvertently flown into the ground. Investigators determined that the flight crew had incorrectly interpreted the unpublished holding procedure and descended into an area where the minimum safe altitude was far higher than the altitude they had been cleared to fly. However, the subsequent British conclusion to the investigation painted a more complex picture. It found that the instructions issued by air traffic control had been ambiguous and that the unpublished holding pattern itself was unsuitable for a Boeing 727 to fly accurately. The report also concluded that the aircraft should never have been cleared below 7,000 feet while operating in that area, noting that the assigned altitude of 5,000 feet left no safe terrain clearance. Rather than blaming a single error, the investigation highlighted how misunderstandings, unclear procedures and inadequate terrain protection combined to produce a catastrophe. Dan-Air’s Darkest Day The accident was a devastating blow for Dan-Air London. Founded in 1953, the airline had built an excellent reputation operating inclusive-tour charters, scheduled services and ad hoc flights across Europe. Its fleet of Comets, HS.748s, One-Elevens, 727s and later 737s became a familiar sight at British regional airports throughout the 1970s and 1980s. Although the airline continued to grow following the accident, Flight 1008 remained its worst-ever disaster involving fare-paying passengers. Dan-Air would eventually be acquired by British Airways in 1992, bringing one of Britain’s best-loved independent airlines to an end. Remembering Flight 1008 Dan Air 1008 Memorial in Manchester. Plucas58, CC BY-SA 4.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0>, via Wikimedia Commons Today, more than four decades later, Flight 1008 is sometimes overshadowed by the far more widely known Tenerife Airport Disaster of 1977, which also occurred at Tenerife North Airport. Yet the accident remains a significant event in British aviation history. It reinforced the importance of clearly published instrument procedures, unambiguous air traffic control phraseology and maintaining safe terrain clearance at all times during instrument approaches. For those who remember seeing Dan-Air’s Boeing 727s arriving at airports around Britain, Flight 1008 also serves as a poignant reminder of an airline that played an important role in UK aviation—and of the 146 people whose holiday ended in tragedy on the slopes of Tenerife. Boeing 727 Special For more content on the classic Boeing 727 trijet airliner, Airport Spotting Premium members have access to the special edition July 2026 magazine packed full of articles and info. For this, and all the other content that comes with a Premium membership, you can sign up here . Title image: clipperarctic, CC BY-SA 2.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
2021 Cirrus SF50 G2+ Vision Jet Offers Immediate Availability and Advanced Safety Features
Each day, the team at Aircraft For Sale picks an airplane that catches our attention because it is unique, represents a good deal, or has other interesting qualities. You can read Aircraft For Sale: Today's Top Pick at FLYINGMag.com daily. Today's Top Pick is a 2021 Cirrus SF50 G2+ Pilots who routinely use their light aircraft for family transport know the value of providing a smooth, comfortable, airline-style experience for passengers. Let's add "uneventful" to the description, because passengers generally do not like surprises when flying—no steep turns, abrupt changes in altitude, or unstabilized approaches. An air stair entry helps the SF50 feel like a small airliner. [Credit: Aerista] The Cirrus SF50, with intuitive, pilot-friendly systems, pressurized cabin, and 300 ktas cruise speed, could be an ideal vehicle for enjoyable, efficient cross-country travel. Like other Cirrus aircraft, the Vision Jet has a built-in airframe parachute for deployment in emergencies such as engine failures or loss of control. It is also equipped with the Safe Return Emergency Autoland system, which enables passengers to initiate an automated landing in cases of pilot incapacitation. Perhaps the most attractive feature of the aircraft for sale today is its availability. Buyers often wait a year or more for delivery after ordering a new Vision Jet, but used models generally are ready for shoppers to acquire right away. The prospect of getting airborne in a new-to-you light jet without a long wait makes this example especially attractive. This 2021 Cirrus Vision Jet has 615 hours on its airframe and engine since new. The aircraft is equipped for flight into known icing conditions. It is also equipped with air conditioning, extended baggage, compartment, stick shaker and pusher system for stall avoidance, custom Xi interior and exterior, seating for seven, and USB ports. The SF50’s distinctive V-tail design stands out on the ramp. [Credit: Aerista] The panel features Perspective Touch+ by Garmin avionics with 14-inch high-resolution displays for PFD and MFD, digital audio panel, dual WAAS GPS/Nav/Coms, enhanced data logging, ADS-B In and Out, ADS-B traffic and weather, terrain and obstacle awareness, dual AHRS, and a three-axis digital autopilot Pilots interested in stepping up to the speed, payload and pressurized cabin comfort of a jet should consider this 2021 Cirrus SF50 G2+ Vision Jet, which is available for $2.9 million on AircraftForSale. If you're interested in financing, you can do so with FLYING Finance. Use our airplane loan calculator to calculate your estimated monthly payments. Or, to speak with an aviation finance specialist, visit flyingfinance.com . FLYING Magazine: We Fly: Cirrus Vision Jet G2+ FLYING Magazine: Cirrus Vision Jet Gets Auto Radar, Cirrus IQ FLYING Magazine: Cirrus Vision Jet Gains FAA Type Certification FLYING Magazine: Cirrus Vision Jet Wins Collier Trophy Plane + Pilot : 2019 Planes of the Year: Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet G2 And Piper 100 Plane + Pilot : Going Direct: Why the Cirrus SF50 Vision Jet Matters AVweb: Cirrus SF50 VisionJet: Fast Track to Production The Aviation Consumer: Cirrus Vision Jet G2: Higher, Quieter, Safer
Crew oversight led to Boeing 737 Max 8 slow, shallow take-off at Luton after intersection departure change
Pilots accepted intersection departure for Max 8 but did not update flight-management computer. UK investigators have determined that the crew of a Boeing 737 Max 8 did not update performance data after switching from a planned full-length runway take-off to an intersection departure. The crew of the Ascend Airways jet (G-CRUX) had informed London Luton air traffic control that they could accept a departure from intersection A of runway 25. But the pilots, who had originally intended a full-length take-off, failed to verify that the revised V-speed data had been correctly entered into flight-management computer. This resulted in a lower thrust setting than required. Flight-data analysis revealed that the maximum thrust during the take-off roll was 82.1% rather than the 85.2% needed. Available runway distance from intersection A was 1,771m — some 345m less than the full length. Owing to the low thrust, the take-off roll was "long", says the Air Accidents Investigation Branch, and the aircraft lifted off just 162m from the runway end — crossing it at a height of just 13ft. According to the inquiry the subsequent climb was "slow" and "very shallow". Air traffic control information stated that the aircraft appeared on radar to be climbing through 900ft about 0.8nm from the airport. "Under normal circumstances the aircraft would appear much closer to the airfield at that height," the inquiry says. It points out that an engine failure or loss of thrust during the take-off roll could potentially have resulted in an overrun. None of the 162 passengers and six crew members was injured during the occurrence on 22 April last year. Ascend Airways' UK division ceased operations in April this year.
The Daily Touch & Go
The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.