Image: PJSC "UAC" · CC BY-SA 4.0 · via Wikimedia Commons
United Airlines Cracks Down on Reserve Flight Attendants Absent from Base During Duty Period
United Airlines enforces strict reserve duty rules, terminating flight attendants accused of being out of position; union challenges new policy.
The gist
United Airlines fires new-hire flight attendants for failing to be physically present at base during reserve duty, sparking union dispute.
United Airlines has intensified enforcement against junior flight attendants who fail to be present at their assigned bases during reserve duty periods. The Chicago-based carrier has been issuing disciplinary actions, including terminations, targeting those deemed 'out of position'—a term for being absent from the base city or its vicinity when on reserve. This move affects new-hire flight attendants, who typically spend their early careers on reserve, ready to fill last-minute crew shortages caused by illness or schedule adjustments.
Reserve duty at United generally means flight attendants have no fixed flights but must remain available for callouts, often at short notice. The carrier requires them to be physically present at their base city or within a three-hour travel distance at the start of their reserve period, which officially begins at one minute past midnight. United expects those on reserve to have arrived in their base city by 11 p.m. the night before their duty begins to ensure availability.
Many junior flight attendants do not reside in their assigned base cities, given United’s hubs are located in high-cost metro areas in the U.S. This economic challenge has led some crew members to attempt commuting during the reserve period or, in more calculated cases, remain outside the base city altogether. Some attendants risk being out of position by booking standby flights to the base city after their reserve period has started, while others do not return to base promptly, betting on the low likelihood of being called out.
United Airlines monitors compliance by analyzing crew flight booking data, rather than using location tracking via company devices. If a flight attendant has a confirmed standby flight departing after their reserve period begins, or if one has traveled away from their base city without a return ticket before reserve starts, the airline interprets this as evidence of being out of position. Disciplinary actions have consequently followed to enforce these standards.
The Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA), representing the crew, has opposed this strict interpretation. The union points to the contract language which mandates that reserve attendants must be available to accept assignments and report timely once those assignments are granted, rather than being physically present at base by a specific cutoff time without an assignment. They have filed a grievance contesting United’s clampdown.
While the union’s challenge progresses through arbitration or legal channels, United continues applying its policy, warning flight attendants that those deemed out of position will face disciplinary measures, including termination. This hardline stance echoes similar moves seen at other major U.S. carriers; for instance, American Airlines terminated over 50 flight attendants in six months during 2022 under comparable circumstances.
Being on reserve is known as one of the most stressful early-career experiences for flight attendants. The unpredictable schedule, minimal off days, and tight availability windows can result in substantial personal hardship. Flight attendants occasionally try to increase their home time by reducing unnecessary travel to their bases, despite the contractual obligation to be ready for callouts, which United now enforces with a zero-tolerance approach.
Frequently asked questions
- What does being 'out of position' mean for United Airlines reserve flight attendants?
- It refers to flight attendants not being physically present at their assigned base or within a three-hour travel distance when their reserve duty period begins, violating United's policy.
- How is United Airlines determining if flight attendants are out of position?
- The airline reviews flight booking data to check if crew members have standby flights scheduled after their reserve period starts or have not returned to their base city on time.
- What is the union's stance on United's policy about reserve duty presence?
- The union argues that crew members only need to accept assignments and report on time once called, and being physically at base before assignment is not contractually required.
Read more
All Airlines →
United Airlines Anticipates Full Fuel Cost Recovery by Q4 Amid Rising Expenses
US carrier’s operating profits slip 17% to $1.1 billion in second quarter. United Airlines expects to be recovering all of its additional fuel costs through higher fares by the fourth quarter after today disclosing an operating profit of almost $1.1 billion in the second quarter. The Star Alliance carrier's second-quarter operating profit was down 17% on the $1.3 billion it made for the same period in 2025, while net profit slipped to $805 million from $973 million a year before. That was achieved in the face of a $2.3 billion – or 84% – increase in its fuel costs for the April-June period. The carrier estimates it recovered around half of this additional cost during the second quarter. United’s revenues climbed 16% in the second quarter to almost $17.7 billion, supported by a 12% rise in yields. United Airlines chief executive Scott Kirby says: “United is built to thrive in every environment, and when oil prices spiked in March, we quickly and decisively acted to adjust our schedules, while simultaneously doubling down on our customer investments." The US carrier estimates, based on current oil prices, that its fuel costs for the full year will be nearly $6 billion higher than in 2025. "In the third quarter the company expects to recover approximately 80% to 90% of the increase, and 100% by the fourth quarter," it says.
Airlines Confirm Structural Shift with Sustained Fare Increases Amid Rising Fuel Costs
Earnings season has officially begun with, as always, Delta kicking off festivities late last week and then United just yesterday releasing its numbers . The airlines unsurprisingly did very well, but the results and more importantly, forward-looking guidance, show that we may have finally seen a structural shift. Airfares are up, and I don’t imagine they’ll be going back down anytime soon. On the surface, it looks like Delta is outperforming with an operating margin of 9.4 percent versus United’s 6.2 percent, but remember, Delta owns a refinery and that helped boost the company’s fortunes this quarter. Since today’s topic is about the core business, let’s try and strip out fuel’s impact. Excluding the refinery, Delta’s operating revenues were up 13.9 percent, below United’s 16.0 percent Fuel expense at Delta rose 67.2 percent year-over-year while United was up 84.1 percent Fuel went from being worth 55.8 percent of Delta’s largest expense — total salaries and wages expense — to 86.3 percent, but at United fuel soared to become the airline’s number one cost at 109 percent of salaries and wages Delta’s unit costs were up 21.4 percent, but excluding fuel, they were up only 6.8 percent while United’s numbers were up 15.2 and 6.1 percent respectively You get it. Fuel is a big deal, and it was very messy in Q2 when the bulk of the Iran War was being waged. And yes, I’m well aware that it’s still being waged and probably won’t end anytime soon now that Iran has learned it can toy with the Strait of Hormuz whenever it feels like it. Just look at the downward slope reversing course recently. via IATA And when fuel goes up, fares have to go up. In the past, this often meant cutting significant capacity thanks to basic economics, but that’s not happening now. And even when fuel came down off its highs, fares didn’t budge downward at all. Demand has been very strong, and it took an event like this to get airlines to actually be able to take real pricing increases for the first time in a long time. To see what I mean, you can look at the Government Accountability Office’s new report on the impact of mergers . I sat with Courtney Miller as my guest host on The Air Show this week to talk about that report in detail. I won’t get into those details here, because it frankly isn’t helpful to this discussion since the study period stopped in 2024. This just provides the historical context that fares have been going down for quite some time. In other words, while this consolidated industry structure has been in the works for a couple decades, the airlines really didn’t significantly flex their pricing muscles until recently. The Air Show A podcast about the business of the sky Listen on Spotify | Listen on Apple Podcasts There’s no question that consolidation made this possible, and sometimes in ways you might not imagine. For example, airline pricing teams are better at their jobs simply because there are fewer of them out there. The ones that remain tend to be much better at the job at hand. The reason this is so important for gaining pricing power is that one airline has historically been able to tank a fare initiative pretty easily, even something as simple as a small, across-the-board fare increase. Today, we aren’t seeing that. Let’s get back to Delta’s results — I can’t do this with United yet since the 10-Q wasn’t out at the time of publication. Strip out things like loyalty revenues (which always seems to go up these days) and look at just Delta’s Q2 ticket revenue, and we see it increased 12.5 percent year-over-year. The reality is that fares went up much more than that, because a decent chunk of Q2 bookings happened before the recent run-up. But even 12.5 percent is a remarkable increase considering that capacity was flat. This doesn’t look like a temporary blip, even though we know everything in this industry is somewhat temporary. Just look at Delta which reaffirmed its earnings guidance for the full year and United which improved it . They won’t be the only ones. It’s easy to say this is all due to that growing pot of credit card money or refinery earnings or something else, and yes, those all help. But the reality is that none of this happens without the industry’s main players all realizing that there is room for higher fares. Even if that weren’t the case, it has become easier for airlines to insulate themselves from low-cost airline fare actions, something that has always been a problem. Pricing is far more complex than it was in the past, so there are more levers to pull. If Frontier decided it wanted a massive sale since its results are not great, the other airlines could match with Basic Economy fares only and not see their entire fare structure collapse. The ability to better segment means that fare actions can be compartmentalized. The airlines love segmentation so much that it continues to spread. Delta is now introducing Basic Business — or as I like to call it, Delta None — which will undoubtedly keep the same pricing business class has today, simply creating an upsell for those who want a seat assignment in advance along with other goodies. It’s a straight-up fare increase that others likely can’t torpedo. (United has already gone down this path anyway.) All this being said, fare increases don’t work in a vacuum. Capacity levels are very important, and the industry has seen capacity decline dramatically very recently. Spirit finally went away in Q2 after being unsustainable as a business for a couple of years. This takes away one more desperate management team and further consolidates the industry into something more rational. This doesn’t mean that fares will only go up from now on. There will be a recession. There will be downturns. Maybe there will even be a well-funded startup, though that doesn’t seem very likely today. We don’t know when, but when this happens, fares will fall. But instead of plunging, airlines will better manage their capacity and keep pricing at a higher level. This is exactly the kind of thing former American CEO Doug Parker meant when he said the industry wouldn’t lose money again. It was a tone-deaf statement that didn’t land with employees, but it also didn’t prove to be strictly true. Of course, he wasn’t thinking about a global pandemic when he said it; he was talking about normal economic cycles. And he was right. The thing is, the big airlines hadn’t really been willing to test it out until this year once it was pretty clear they had largely vanquished the low-cost carrier threat. Admittedly, we haven’t seen this tested in any significant way since the pandemic ended. Only time will tell if this is right or not, but the fact that airlines are pushing fares higher and not seeing much blowback means they will be emboldened to keep trying to push the envelope. Now the only real question is whether the government will eventually decide this is an antitrust issue that it needs to revisit.
United Airlines surpasses Q2 earnings forecasts despite $6 billion fuel cost surge
United Airlines' second quarter financial results beat Wall Street projections despite the US carrier projecting a $6 billion fuel hit this year. On July 15, 2026, United Airlines CEO Scott Kirby lauded the airline's ability to "thrive in every environment" even when oil prices spiked in March 2026. "We quickly and decisively acted to adjust our schedules, while simultaneously doubling down on our customer investments," Kirby added. United confirmed that full-year adjusted diluted earnings per share guidance is raised to $9 to $11. The airline posted adjusted earnings of $1.99 per share, above the $1.85 predictions. Based on oil prices as of July 14, 2026, United expects nearly $6 billion in added fuel expense for full-year 2026 compared to the expectation at the start of the year. United Airlines In the second quarter alone fuel expenses were up $2.3 billion, although the company said it was able to recover around half of this increase. Its successes included premium revenue being up 16% compared to the second quarter of 2025, while revenue from economy class was up 11%. United's revenue for the second quarter rose 16% to $17.67 billion. During the same period last year, the figure was $15.2 billion. The company's operating income was down 17% from $1.3 billion during the second quarter in 2025 to $1 billion over the same period in 2026. Net income also dropped 17% to $805 million from $973 million last year. Highlights included United announcing that 450 aircraft now have Starlink stalled with nearly 1,000 expected by year end. United said it remains on track to bring Starlink to the whole fleet by the end of 2027. You can view the full results on the United Airlines website . RELATED Rolls-Royce, Boeing and Lufthansa line up new 787-9 ecoDemonstrator venture
United Airlines Expands Airbus A321neo Orders Amid Boeing 737 MAX 10 Delays
Within the US, Airbus has made significant inroads with airlines of all sizes. It has sold hundreds of Airbus A321s to Delta Air Lines, while American Airlines is the world's largest operator of the A320 family. In the process, however, United Airlines got left behind, and its 2010 merger with Continental Airlines gave it a massive Boeing 737 fleet, a type that it's continued to order in large quantities over the past 16 years.
The Daily Touch & Go
The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.