Illustration: The Touch & Go
FAA Investigates Boeing 777 Low Pass Maneuver During Qatar Airways Cargo Delivery Flight
The FAA has opened a review after a Boeing 777 performed a low pass at a Texas airport ahead of its handover to Qatar Airways Cargo, raising safety questions.
The gist
FAA reviews low altitude pass by Boeing 777 during pre-delivery flight to Qatar Airways Cargo.
Continuing coverage
All Faa →- FAA Opposes Cleveland's Plan to Close Burke Lakefront Airport; Congressional Override Lacks Support
- BETA Begins Three-Week Electric Aircraft Test Flights in Southeast Texas
- FAA assigns AT&T central role in $2 billion air traffic network overhaul
- FAA and Ohio Senators Firmly Oppose Closure of Burke Lakefront Airport
- FAA Seeks Billions More to Fund CAP Automation Amid Growing Industry Competition
The Federal Aviation Administration is conducting a formal investigation into a recent low pass maneuver performed by a Boeing 777 aircraft on a predelivery flight in Texas. The airplane, destined for Qatar Airways Cargo, carried out the low altitude pass shortly before it was scheduled to join the airline's cargo fleet.
The Boeing 777, known for its long-haul range and wide-body design, was on a final test and delivery route when the low-level flyby occurred. Such maneuvers can be routine for demonstration or certification purposes but are subject to strict regulatory oversight to ensure they comply with safety and noise abatement standards.
Qatar Airways Cargo, one of the world's leading cargo carriers, is expanding its fleet with the addition of this new 777, anticipating enhanced capacity and range capabilities. The aircraft's entry into service marks a strategic step in the airline’s ongoing fleet modernization and capacity enhancement efforts.
The FAA's review aims to assess whether the low pass adhered to the agency's flight operation regulations and to determine if any safety protocols were breached. This scrutiny reflects the agency’s commitment to maintaining stringent safety standards during all phases of aircraft delivery and testing.
Historically, low pass procedures during delivery flights have been a subject of close safety enforcement, balancing operational demonstration needs with public safety and noise concerns. The outcome of the FAA’s investigation could influence future guidance on permissible flight maneuvers during delivery.
Industry observers are watching the investigation's progress closely, as it underscores the challenges in managing aircraft demonstration flights within regulatory frameworks. The findings may prompt revisions in protocols governing predelivery flight operations, potentially affecting both manufacturers and airlines.
Read more
All Aviation Safety →
Vietnam Airlines B787-9 Overruns Munich Runway with Late Rotation, Sustains Gear Damage
A Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787-9, registration VN-A867, operating flight VN34 from Munich to Hanoi , encountered a significant takeoff performance issue on 15 August 2026. The aircraft rotated extremely late on Runway 26L and became airborne near or beyond the runway end. ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(119); }); Takeoff Sequence The 787-9 commenced its takeoff roll on Munich’s 4,000-metre runway 26L. Ground footage shows the main landing gear remaining in contact until the final portion of the pavement. A large dust cloud rose as the aircraft lifted off. Preliminary reports from aviation sources indicate a late rotation accompanied by a tailstrike. The aircraft appears to have overrun the paved surface by approximately 120 metres. It then became airborne in the grass near the first row of approach lights and reportedly damaged runway edge lighting. ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(127); }); Immediate Crew Response After becoming airborne, the crew levelled off around 9,000–10,000 feet and entered a holding pattern in the Munich area. The aircraft was fuelled for the long-haul sector and therefore above maximum landing weight. The crew initiated fuel jettison and burned fuel for roughly 90 minutes to two hours. They also reported a tyre-pressure indication. Before committing to landing, the crew conducted one or more low approaches over Runway 26R, allowing ground personnel to visually assess the underside and tail section. ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(128); }); Vietnam Airlines Boeing 787-9 Dreamliner reportedly overruns the runway during take-off from Munich. The aircraft is currently on approach to the airport after holding. Video: MunichAviation pic.twitter.com/qqbWSV2jrN — Breaking Aviation News & Videos (@aviationbrk) August 15, 2026 Landing and Aircraft Condition The aircraft landed safely on Runway 26R. Multiple tyres on the left main gear failed or shredded during the landing roll, and the left main gear was observed trailing smoke. The aircraft became temporarily disabled on the runway and required towing. Airport rescue and firefighting services responded as a precaution. ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(129); }); Outcome and Investigation No injuries were reported among passengers or crew. Vietnam Airlines confirmed that the flight returned due to a technical issue, that standard procedures were followed, and that all occupants are safe. Munich Airport confirmed the extended takeoff roll and subsequent landing-gear and tyre damage. Germany’s Federal Bureau of Aircraft Accident Investigation (BFU) is examining the event. The precise cause — whether related to takeoff performance calculation, aircraft configuration, or another factor — remains under investigation. ezstandalone.cmd.push(function () { ezstandalone.showAds(130); }); Further technical details are expected once the formal investigation progresses.
Southwest Pilot Who Reported Cockpit Misconduct Faces Union Sanctions Demand
A Southwest captain pled guilty after exposing himself and watching porn in the cockpit during a flight to Orlando while his first officer continued flying the plane. Now, years into the first officer's lawsuit claiming Southwest and its pilots union retaliated against her for reporting the incident, the union is asking a court to sanction her and make her pay its legal fees.
Air India A320neo Flight Control Systems Briefly Failed Before 300-Foot Plunge Injuring 24
The flight control systems of an Air India Airbus A320neo narrowbody plane which suddenly plunged 300 feet while at cruising altitude, leaving 24 passengers and crew injured, went dark for several seconds, an internal report from the aircraft manufacturer has revealed. Air India flight AI-2379 from Phuket, Thailand to Delhi on August 4 was flying at a cruising altitude of around 34,000 feet when it unexpectedly dropped. Anyone and anything that wasn't strapped down was thrown into the air. Multiple passengers and crew were injured after they were slammed into the ceiling of the seven-year-old aircraft Around 20 passengers and four cabin crew members were injured in the incident, many of whom had to be transported to the hospital with head, neck, and spinal injuries. In a new internal report from Airbus which had been viewed by Reuters but not independently verified, it is claimed that the flight control system that controls the plane's elevators and ailerons suddenly became unavailable for around four seconds. During this brief period, the plane pitched up. The First Officer responded by pointing the nose of the plane down but there was no immediate correction due to the alleged loss of hydraulic systems. The document does not establish the cause of the incident and the events are still under investigation by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Branch (AAIB) with support from the French Bureau d'Enquetes et d'Analyses (BEA). Late last year, Airbus issued an urgent safety alert for its range of best-selling A320 family single-aisle aircraft following an investigation into an incident aboard a JetBlue aircraft when the plane suddenly pitched down mid-flight without any input from the pilots. Engineers were able to establish that the unexpected pitch-down input came from a malfunctioning ELAC computer unit. The ELAC stands for Elevator & Aileron Computer, and it is designed to interpret the inputs the pilots are putting into the controls and then smoothly and correctly control the elevators and ailerons. Airbus believes that the ELAC was corrupted by intense solar radiation, although the issue only affected a software update known as L104. To fix the issue, airlines were ordered to restore all aircraft with the L104 software to the last version before this. In most cases, this required engineers to plug a Portable Data Loader with the older L103 software into the cockpit computer of affected planes and reinstall the tested software. Although there are around 11,500 Airbus A320 series aircraft in active commercial service around the world, only 6,000 of these had the L104 software installed. Earlier this week, it was revealed that the Captain of flight 2379 had failed a second drug test. As is standard practice following a serious aviation occurrence, all of the crew are subject to drug testing. The Captain's initial rapid test came back as 'non negative' so a more detailed test was ordered. Investigators are yet to confirm the results of this test, but sources claim it tes tested positive for cannabis. There is currently no suggestion that illegal banned had anything to do with the events that unfolded on flight 2379.
FAA Seeks Billions More to Fund CAP Automation Amid Growing Industry Competition
As competition for the FAA's common automation platform (CAP) contract heats up, the agency still lacks the funds required to develop the technology, which is envisioned to combine its En Route Automation Modernization (ERAM) and Standard Terminal Automation Replacement System (STARS) platforms. Thales becomes the latest company to pitch a CAP solution to the FAA. On Wednesday, it announced TopSky-America, a cloud-based, AI-powered platform that it said is tailored for the FAA to enhance information sharing, decision making, and situational awareness for air traffic controllers (ATCs). The idea is to reduce controller workload by combining data from ERAM, which manages high-altitude flights, and STARS, which coordinates arrivals and departures in towers and terminal route approach control (TRACON) facilities, in a single digital interface. STARS also provides sequencing and issues weather updates and conflict alerts. The CAP is billed as a core pillar of the Transportation Department's (DOT) Brand New Air Traffic Control System (BNATCS) effort. Without funding, though, it is unclear how the FAA plans to support the CAP's development and deployment. Congress last year allocated $12.5 billion toward BNATCS, while the DOT has requested a total of $31.5 billion to fund its more expensive components. The Modern Skies Coalition, led by the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), in July called on Congress to allocate another $20 billion toward the effort. It estimated that the CAP alone would cost $10 billion. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has previously asked for the additional $20 billion but in recent months has signalled that the agency would settle for less. Duffy on Tuesday said the DOT "would love $20 [billion], but we'll take $10 [billion]." The secretary clarified that $10 billion would cover certain software upgrades planned under BNATCS. A "second $10 billion," he said, would be required for the "actual bricks and mortar" of new ATC facilities, such as TRACONs. Duffy did not mention the CAP in his remarks Monday, and the FAA's internal estimate of its cost is unclear. Thales said Thursday that it supports the "FAA's call for additional congressional funding." Competition Heats Up Thales described TopSky-America as an advanced ATC automation system "built specifically for the U.S. National Airspace System [NAS]." The platform is a version of the company's popular TopSky-ATC offering. But Thales emphasized that it is "customized for the unique requirements" of and designed "exclusively" for U.S. airspace. "These capabilities will deliver greater predictability for air carriers and the traveling public, improve operational performance, and help reduce workload on the controller workforce—while continuing to uphold the highest standards of safety," the company said in its announcement. TopSky-America is not the only CAP candidate. RTX's Collins Aerospace is pitching a version of its AutoTrac platform for the FAA contract, FlightGlobal reported in March. Collins was previously selected for BNATCS to provide hundreds of new ATC radars , while parent RTX is the FAA's prime STARS contractor. Leidos, which maintains the ERAM system, also has a CAP solution . The Air Current in April reported that Thales, Collins, Leidos, Australia's Frequentis, and Spain's Indra—the FAA's other BNATCS radar contractor—are the five companies shortlisted for the CAP contract. Thales' path to winning the contract could involve highlighting the success of its TopSky-ATC, which it estimates manages 40 percent of air traffic globally. The company in July announced agreements to modernize the air traffic management systems of Singapore and Mongolia. It also produces primary and secondary ATC surveillance radars and is developing capabilities for the management of uncrewed aircraft systems (UAS) traffic. Also working in the French company's favor is a commitment to design TopSky-America software upgrades in the U.S., a nod to the DOT's desire for domestic companies to lead the ATC modernization effort. "One of the focuses in modernization was to onshore production of critical infrastructure," FAA Administrator Bryan Bedford said Tuesday. "We have brought those jobs back to the United States, which is a key focus of [Secretary Duffy] and [President Donald Trump]." Thales has about 5,000 U.S. employees and said producing the platform domestically will create hundreds of new jobs. Ultimately, the contract award could come down to a battle among the shortlisted companies. Thales earlier this year lost out on the FAA's contract for Strategic Management of Airspace, Routes, and Trajectories (SMART)—an AI-powered, predictive air traffic management software —after being shortlisted for that award. Bedford said Tuesday that Thales, Palantir, and Air Space Intelligence (ASI), which ultimately won the contract, each created digital twins of the NAS for evaluation. Duffy described the exercise as a "competition" and said ASI produced the "best product, the best tool that we thought would help us best manage the airspace." "We want the best companies building our software," Duffy said. "And what's different is we're not just picking a contractor to work for us. We're actually going through a competition to see who actually can deliver on behalf of the FAA."
The Daily Touch & Go
The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.