Skip to content
The Touch and GoThe Touch and Go
The Touch & GoStoryAviation Safety
Commercial airliner avoiding Gulf region airspace amidst geopolitical tension
Aviation SafetyBy The Touch & Go EditorialPublished Jul 19, 10:15 AM2 min read

EASA bans flights over Gulf states amid renewed US-Iran hostilities

EASA advises airlines to avoid Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, UAE, and parts of the Gulf of Oman due to escalating military conflict and missile threats through July 29.

The gist

EASA orders airlines to avoid Gulf airspace amid heightened US-Iran tensions and missile threats through late July.

Continuing coverage

All Flight Safety

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has mandated airlines under its jurisdiction to avoid operating within the airspace of several Gulf states including Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates. This directive was issued on July 14, 2026, in response to renewed hostilities between the United States and Iran that have sharply elevated risks for civil aviation in the region. The ban extends to all altitudes and flight levels and applies through July 29 unless the agency rescinds it earlier.

Alongside the specified Gulf states, EASA's Conflict Zone Information Bulletin also encompasses the airspace over the Gulf of Oman within the Muscat Flight Information Region west of 58 degrees east longitude. The advisory affects airlines regulated by EASA and foreign operators flying to, from, or within the European Union who operate under EASA authorization. Although individual nations control their own airspace, this guidance effectively limits many aviation corridors for these carriers across this volatile region.

The agency cited multiple breaches of a US-Iran ceasefire accord as key contributors to the deteriorating security environment in the Gulf. It highlighted Iran’s intensified attempts to dominate the Strait of Hormuz, along with attacks on commercial shipping vessels and the subsequent American military responses, all of which have increased the threat to civil aviation. EASA specifically pointed to the presence of major U.S. military installations within the Gulf states, which may serve as targets for Iranian missile and drone strikes.

Missile and drone operations pose significant hazards including the risk of debris falling into adjacent airspace. Furthermore, the presence of active U.S. and allied regional air defense systems raises concerns over the possible misidentification of civilian aircraft as military threats. EASA underscored that the unpredictable nature of these military developments, including missile launches, combat aircraft activity, and complex air defense systems, presents a high risk for civil flights traversing the affected airspace.

This latest warning comes fewer than seven days after EASA allowed a broader conflict zone bulletin covering the Middle East and Persian Gulf region to expire, following a perceived short-term easing of tensions. The previous, wider advisory was replaced on July 8 with a lower level information note, although existing restrictions remained in place for Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon. However, the security situation worsened once again soon after.

On July 14, Iran launched ballistic missiles at a U.S. air base located in Jordan, prompting the U.S. military to conduct three consecutive nights of offensive operations in retaliation. The escalation also included Iranian moves to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint for global oil shipments, further compounding the risks to civil aviation in the region.

EASA urges airlines to vigilantly track developments concerning regional airspace and to comply with notices issued by national aviation authorities. It also reinforces that separate advisories restricting flight operations within the airspace of Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon will remain effective through August 31. The agency’s warnings highlight the ongoing volatility that continues to challenge aviation safety across the geopolitically sensitive Gulf and surrounding areas.

Share

Frequently asked questions

Which countries' airspace has EASA advised airlines to avoid due to the US-Iran conflict?
EASA advises airlines to avoid the airspace of Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and parts of the Gulf of Oman west of 58 degrees east longitude.
What specific threats does EASA cite for the airspace restrictions in the Gulf region?
EASA cites missile and drone strikes, attacks on commercial ships, military actions, potential debris hazards, and the risk of civilian planes being mistaken for military targets by active air defenses.
How long will the current EASA airspace avoidance directive remain in effect?
The directive issued on July 14, 2026, remains valid through July 29 unless rescinded earlier, with separate advisories on Iran, Iraq, and Lebanon airspace valid through August 31.
UK investigators wrestle with scant clues to explain fatal Zeusch King Air crash
Aviation SafetyJul 13, 11:36 AM

UK investigators probe limited clues in fatal Zeusch King Air crash at Southend

Fire and lack of recorder data left little evidence after loss of control at London Southend. UK investigators are still trying to determine the reasons behind the fatal loss of control involving a Zeusch Aviation Beechcraft B200 Super King Air at London Southend a year ago . The aircraft yawed slightly to the left just before rotating from runway 05, and then deviated "immediately" to the left of the centreline as it became airborne, says the UK Air Accidents Investigation Branch. It reached 70-80ft in height in a climbing left turn, its heading changing by 90°, before it descended and crashed within the airport perimeter. The inquiry says the flightpath has been established through a combination of ADS-B data, surveillance camera footage, and video from witnesses. But the aircraft was not required to carry a cockpit-voice or flight-data recorder, and the airframe was substantially damaged by the impact and post-crash fire. This meant "only limited physical evidence" remained, says the inquiry in an update on the 13 July 2025 accident. "Detailed examination of the aircraft and its components, while limited to some extent by the damage sustained, has been conducted in co-ordination with the relevant manufacturers," it adds. None of the four occupants survived the crash. "The investigation has focused on understanding the factors which contributed to the loss of control," says the inquiry in an update. "It is examining relevant technical, operational, human and organisational factors to determine if these aspects contributed to the accident." Bearing the Dutch registration PH-ZAZ, the aircraft had been bound for Lelystad in the Netherlands.

Beechcraft B200 Super King Air climbing steeply after takeoff at Southend Airport
Aviation SafetyJul 13, 10:30 AM

Beechcraft B200 crash at Southend Airport: AAIB details loss of control moments after takeoff

Investigators at the Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) have provided an update on the anniversary of the London Southend Airport (SEC) crash tragedy which killed all four people onboard the aircraft. On July 13, 2026, the UK's accident investigation team said due to the impact and ensuing post-crash fire, only limited physical evidence remained on the Beechcraft B200 Super King Air. The AAIB revealed that prior to rotation the aircraft yawed slightly to the left before experiencing a loss of control shortly after takeoff. "Once airborne, it immediately deviated to the left of the runway centerline in a climbing left turn. It reached an altitude of between 70 – 80 ft above the runway level, having turned through 90°, before descending towards the ground," the AAIB confirmed. The investigators said that much of their focus has been on trying to establish the factors which contributed to the loss of control. Technical, operational, human, and organizational factors are all being examined. BREAKING: A plane has crashed at London Southend Airport, sparking a massive fireball. pic.twitter.com/Sv2BQgLFQb — Weather Monitor (@WeatherMonitors) July 13, 2025 "Detailed examination of the aircraft and its components, while limited to some extent by the damage sustained, has been conducted in coordination with the relevant manufacturers," the AAIB added. The AAIB said it was able to establish the Beechcraft B200's flightpath by analyzing witness video, CCTV imagery, and ADS-B data. There was no requirement for either a flight data or cockpit voice recorder to be installed on the aircraft. The investigation is ongoing and a final report will be published once all investigation activities have been completed. "At this time, our thoughts remain with the families and friends of those who lost their lives in this accident and all those affected by it," the AAIB said in its statement. What happened during the Southend Airport crash? The Beechcraft B200 Super King Air, registered PH-ZAZ, crashed and erupted into a fireball at Southend Airport on July 13, 2026. The aircraft was operated by Zeusch Aviation, a company that provides medical evacuation and transplant flights, aerial mapping, relay flights, and aerial surveillance. Witnesses reported that the aircraft rolled to the left, nearly reaching an inverted position, before crashing. Two pilots, a doctor and a nurse were among those killed. The accident was the UK's most serious aviation incident in recent years. RELATED London Southend Airport suspends operations after Beechcraft B200 fireball crash

Man Refuses To Sit Next To Woman On Plane, Citing “Sharia Law,” Then Punches Flight Attendant
Aviation SafetyJul 19, 9:56 AM

Passenger refuses to sit beside woman citing Sharia law, assaults flight attendant on Turkey-Germany flight

A German resident of Turkish descent was arrested upon landing on a flight from Turkey to Germany, after he refused to sit next to a female seat mate, only to then punch the flight attendant when she tried to help with the situation. The guy then proceeded to insult police officers in Turkish, leading to even more charges… talk about awful behavior. Passenger causes commotion on Turkey to Germany flight German media is reporting on an incident that happened on June 1, 2026, on a flight from Samsun, Turkey (SZF), to Dusseldorf, Germany (DUS). This happened on a SunExpress flight, with that being a leisure airline that's a joint venture between Lufthansa and Turkish Airlines. According to reports, the 29-year-old man ended up in a situation where he was sitting next to a female, which he wasn't comfortable with, claiming it was in violation of Sharia law. When the flight attendant confronted him, he reportedly punched her in the face. German Federal Police were called to the airport in Dusseldorf shortly before 7AM, to take a report of the assault. A criminal complaint was subsequently filed. The passenger confessed to the crime, though the conversation didn't go smoothly. The man reportedly insulted the police officers in Turkish, thinking they wouldn't understand. However, since one of the officers spoke Turkish, the man received an additional charge of insult, beyond his charge of assault. One detail that's not known is the context in which he ended up sitting next to a woman. Like, how did this incident only happen while the plane was in the air, and not on the ground in Turkey, before departure, since presumably he would've been offloaded at that point? This incident happened on a SunExpress flight This situation is obviously terrible on all levels Even as someone who isn't really religious, I think people are entitled to there sincerely held religious beliefs. However, if your religious beliefs impact the ability of others to go about their day, I think it's on the person with the religious beliefs to make accommodations, rather than putting that burden on others. On the topic of Sharia law, as you'd expect, different people have different interpretations. The idea is that direct contact and interaction with the opposite gender (if not related by blood, marriage, etc.) is only allowed for necessity. I guess the idea here is that if you're sitting next to someone on a plane you could accidentally touch, and that was presumably an issue for him. Now, let me point out that not all people with that general belief system interpret things that way, and many will view it as being fine to sit next to someone of the opposite gender on a plane. If this is really how the guy felt, he should've purchased an extra seat (which SunExpress allows) to prevent any potential touch. Of course the irony here is that he was so concerned about inadvertently making contact with a female, only to then… slap a female, which I'm pretty sure would qualify as direct contact. Then the icing on the cake here is that he insulted the police officers, which is a criminal offense in Germany, and it can even lead to imprisonment. Ouch all around… This guy should've purchased an extra seat, if it was so important Bottom line A passenger on a SunExpress flight had quite the meltdown, when he first refused to sit next to a woman, only to then punch the flight attendant when she tried to intervene. When the flight was met by police in Germany, he then insulted the officers, which is also a crime in Germany. While I respect sincerely held religious beliefs, this guy was 100% in the wrong on all counts here, and I imagine he'll be held accountable for his behavior. What do you make of this flight seating incident?

Drone pilot conducting practical flight evaluation near urban infrastructure
Aviation SafetyJul 13, 4:10 PM

Oregon launches comprehensive public drone pilot training and testing framework

The Oregon Department of Aviation released a training and testing template July 10 for public agencies that operate drones. This new template provides additional model standards that public agencies may adopt and customize for pilot qualifications, recurrent training and public-safety missions. Training Beyond Part 107 The FAA requires Part 107 certificate holders to complete online recurrent training every 24 calendar months, in an effort to maintain aeronautical knowledge recency. Oregon's document goes further by adding written test questions, practical flight evaluations, emergency drills, airspace-deconfliction exercises, privacy and public-records training, maintenance requirements and launch-decision checklists. "This is the next step in building safe and accountable public agency drone programs in Oregon," Oregon Department of Aviation Director Kenji Sugahara said. "A policy tells an agency what the rules are. Training and testing show whether people can actually apply those rules in the field. That matters when drones are being used near roads, bridges, neighborhoods, emergency scenes, firefighters, patients, helicopters, or disaster areas." Public-Agency Requirements Oregon law already requires public bodies to register public-use drones with the state aviation department and submit annual reports. Those reports must summarize how frequently the aircraft were used, explain the primary purposes of the flights and direct the public to the agency's drone policies. Educational institutions register as drone users rather than registering each aircraft. The template is designed for cities, counties, state agencies, fire departments, emergency managers, transportation departments and other public bodies. Optional sections address Drone as First Responder programs, fire and EMS support, search and rescue, emergency management, mutual aid, remote operations and FAA-authorized flights beyond visual line of sight. The department said the document does not create new flight authority, authorize law enforcement activity or permit operations beyond FAA limits.

The Daily Touch & Go

The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.