Skip to content
The Touch and GoThe Touch and Go
The Touch & GoStoryAviation Safety
Valo eVTOL jet taxing on runway under overcast sky at test facility
Aviation SafetyBy The Touch & Go EditorialPublished Jul 19, 2:15 PM3 min read

Vertical Aerospace Delays Valo eVTOL Air Taxi Certification to 2029

Vertical Aerospace updates its certification timeline for the Valo eVTOL air taxi to 2029, citing regulatory rigor and testing progress.

The gist

Vertical Aerospace pushes its Valo eVTOL air taxi certification to 2029, extending delays driven by testing and certification challenges.

Continuing coverage

All Urban Air Mobility

Vertical Aerospace, the leading U.K. developer of electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) air taxis, has announced a revised timeline for the certification of its flagship Valo aircraft, now targeting 2029. This represents a one-year delay from the 2028 certification expected as recently as late 2024 and further pushes back earlier projected dates. The updated schedule impacts American Airlines and other carriers that placed conditional orders for Valo, delaying potential deliveries and commercial operations by at least a year compared to previous expectations.

The company attributed the delay to the complexity of certifying a completely new aircraft category under existing regulatory frameworks. Vertical Aerospace is pursuing simultaneous type certification with both the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), aiming to comply with EASA's special condition for VTOL (SC-VTOL) Enhanced standards. These standards impose stringent safety requirements equivalent to commercial airline certifications, mandating an extremely low likelihood of catastrophic failure at the 10^-9 level.

Vertical's Valo air taxi concept envisions urban and regional networks connecting major cities like London, New York, and Miami. The company plans to serve high-value routes linking airports, city centers, hospitals, and event venues, leveraging certification to operate safely over populated areas. The company had initially targeted certification in 2025 and entry into service by 2026 or earlier, but has had to continually push back the timeline amid development challenges and regulatory scrutiny.

Comparatively, U.S. competitors such as Joby Aviation and Beta Technologies have advanced to flying conforming preproduction prototypes, a development stage Vertical does not expect to reach until next year due to its cautious regulatory approach and a serious crash of an early VX4 prototype in 2023. The U.S. regulatory environment has allowed somewhat more flexibility, though the FAA has tightened the certification process for eVTOLs recently, causing delays for many manufacturers.

Vertical recently secured expanded flight privileges from the U.K. Civil Aviation Authority (CAA), enabling flight tests beyond Cotswold Airport. The company is simultaneously developing domestic assembly and battery production facilities planned to open soon, supporting scalability once certification progresses. They also revealed ongoing propulsion system testing for a hybrid-electric variant of Valo aimed at delivering up to 1,000 miles of range, with test flights expected in early 2027 and announcements regarding turbogenerator suppliers anticipated this year.

Chief Commercial and Technology Officer Michael Cervenka previously described the goal of concurrent EASA and FAA approvals as 'passporting,' emphasizing the competitive advantage of meeting Europe's highest safety standards. CEO Stuart Simpson acknowledged that their first piloted transition flight was delayed until April 2026, later than planned, which increased the risk to the 2028 certification goal but affirmed the date remained achievable. The recent update suggests the company is taking a more cautious approach to manage that risk, moving the certification milestone to 2029.

Funding progress includes the closing of a financing package worth up to $800 million, securing resources to complete certification efforts. Vertical's Flight Plan 2030 envisions producing 200 Valo aircraft annually and delivering 150 units to customers by the end of the decade, ambitions that will require adherence to the extended timeline and successful development milestones.

The company's trajectory reflects the broader challenges faced by the eVTOL industry, where early optimistic timelines for entry into commercial service have repeatedly been revised due to certification complexities, testing demands, and safety assurance. Vertical's reaffirmed commitment to the SC-VTOL Enhanced category highlights the emphasis on operational safety in populous areas, a crucial factor for widespread acceptance of urban air mobility.

Efforts to develop hybrid-electric variants and potential contracts in defense or cargo sectors could diversify Vertical's portfolio and help sustain momentum during the protracted certification process. With American manufacturers facing similar certification challenges, the eVTOL landscape continues to evolve as manufacturers refine their aircraft design, testing, and regulatory strategies to meet stringent requirements.

Share

Frequently asked questions

Why has Vertical Aerospace delayed the Valo eVTOL certification to 2029?
Vertical Aerospace cited the rigorous process of certifying a new class of aircraft under existing regulatory frameworks and delayed testing milestones as reasons for pushing certification from 2028 to 2029.
What certification standards is Valo targeting?
Valo is being certified to EASA's special condition for VTOL (SC-VTOL) Enhanced category, which mandates safety standards comparable to those of commercial airlines, specifically the 10^-9 failure rate for catastrophic events.
How does Vertical Aerospace's testing progress compare to U.S. competitors?
Unlike U.S. manufacturers like Joby and Beta, which have multiple preproduction prototypes flying, Vertical plans to begin flying conforming preproduction aircraft later, partly due to a 2023 prototype crash and more stringent European regulatory requirements.
Large drone collides with LAPD helicopter during patrol over Los Angeles
Aviation SafetyJul 13, 4:47 PM

Large drone collides with LAPD helicopter over San Fernando Valley, forcing emergency landing

A large drone struck a Los Angeles Police Department helicopter during a patrol over the San Fernando Valley, damaging the aircraft's windshield and forcing the crew to make a precautionary landing. The Airbus AS350 was flying near the 101 Freeway and Reseda Boulevard in Tarzana shortly before 15:00 local time on July 7, 2026, when it collided with the drone, according to the LAPD and a preliminary Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) report. The pilot landed safely at nearby Van Nuys Airport (VNY). Neither of the two officers aboard the helicopter was injured. Authorities described the drone as measuring approximately three feet by three feet, considerably larger than most hobbyist drones. Investigators have not identified its make or model or the person operating it. The collision happened as firefighters battled a brush fire near the Encino Reservoir. An LAPD official said the drone operator may have been attempting to record the fire, although authorities have not determined whether the aircraft was deliberately flown near the helicopter. The FBI and FAA have opened investigations. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass called the incident "completely unacceptable" and warned drone operators against interfering with police and firefighting aircraft. "This is a warning to anybody who's flying a drone that interferes with Fire or Police: We will find you, you will be arrested, and you will be prosecuted," Bass said. Drones operating near wildfires can put a halt to aerial firefighting operations as crews cannot safely share the airspace with an unidentified aircraft. The FAA generally limits drones to 400 feet above the ground, with additional restrictions around airports and emergency operations. Authorities have not released photographs of the damaged helicopter or video showing the collision. The drone operator remained unidentified as of July 13. The incident is the latest collision involving a drone and a crewed aircraft in US airspace. The FAA receives thousands of reports each year involving drones operating near airplanes and helicopters, although confirmed midair collisions remain relatively rare.

Commercial airliner avoiding Gulf region airspace amidst geopolitical tension
Aviation SafetyJul 14, 3:59 PM

EASA bans flights over Gulf states amid renewed US-Iran hostilities

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) has told airlines not to operate in the airspace of Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar or the United Arab Emirates as renewed fighting between the United States and Iran creates unacceptable risks to civil aircraft. The new Conflict Zone Information Bulletin, issued July 14, 2026, also covers airspace over the Gulf of Oman within the Muscat Flight Information Region west of 58 degrees east longitude. EASA's recommendation applies at all altitudes and flight levels and remains valid through July 29 unless the agency rescinds it. The bulletin applies to EASA-regulated airlines and foreign operators flying to, from or within the European Union under an EASA authorization. Individual countries retain authority over their airspace, but EASA's guidance effectively tells airlines under its oversight to stay out of many of the region's aviation corridors. EASA said repeated violations of the US-Iran ceasefire had again created a high level of risk across the Gulf. Iranian efforts to control the Strait of Hormuz, attacks against commercial ships and related US military action have increased the danger in the region, according to the bulletin. EASA also pointed to major US military facilities in Gulf states as potential targets for Iranian missiles and drones. EASA said missile and drone activity, interceptions and falling debris pose a threat to nearby airspace. The agency also warned that active US and regional air defenses could mistake a civilian aircraft for a military target. "Unpredictable military developments, combined with the possible use of missiles, drones, combat aircraft and air-defense systems, create a high risk to civil flights at all altitudes and flight levels within the concerned airspace," EASA said. The agency issued the tougher warning less than a week after allowing a broader Middle East and Persian Gulf bulletin to expire. On July 8, EASA said an overall reduction in short-term tensions meant it would replace the previous bulletin with a lower-level information note covering the wider region. Separate warnings remained in place for Iran, Iraq and Lebanon. The situation has since deteriorated. Iran fired ballistic missiles at a US air base in Jordan on July 14, while US forces carried out a third consecutive night of attacks after Iran moved to close the Strait of Hormuz. EASA advised airlines to continue monitoring regional airspace developments and follow notices issued by national aviation authorities. Separate EASA bulletins advising airlines not to operate in the airspace of Iran, Iraq and Lebanon remain in effect through August 31.

SpaceX Starship rocket poised on launch pad during dusk with ground support equipment at starbase texas
Aviation SafetyJul 14, 12:00 PM

SpaceX Prepares Starship Flight 13 with Upgrades After Booster Flaw Fix

SpaceX announced it made several hardware and software modifications to its massive Starship rocket as it prepares for what could be the vehicle's most critical test flight yet. The launch provider said over the weekend it is targeting a 90-minute launch window that opens at 6:45 p.m. EDT on Thursday for Starship Flight 13, which is a precursor to more ambitious missions the company has planned for 2026. SpaceX said the mission will have "similar objectives" to Flight 12 in May, which was the first test of Starship's larger, more powerful Version 3 (V3) configuration. SpaceX has flown Starship variants since 2023, but the V3 is its first designed to be capable of commercial, orbital deployments of Starlink satellites. It is also the vehicle around which the company's human landing system (HLS)—a candidate to deliver astronauts to the moon on future NASA lunar missions—is based. The first of those missions is scheduled for early 2028, putting pressure on SpaceX to deliver a viable spacecraft. The company validated some of the V3 upgrades on Flight 12. But the rocket's Super Heavy booster failed to complete its flip and boostback burn as intended, causing it to land hard in the Gulf of Mexico and prompting the FAA to ground it . The FAA closed the SpaceX-led Flight 12 mishap investigation on Monday, clearing the way for Starship to return to action—and to form. The rocket completed five suborbital test flights in 2025, with the final two in August and October being the most successful. But the seven-month gap between Flights 11 and 12 was the longest drought since Starship debuted in 2023. With the V3 Starship, SpaceX in 2026 aims to complete its first mission to low-Earth orbit (LEO), achieve full reusability, and demonstrate docking and propellant transfer on orbit. The key to hitting those milestones will be returning to regular flight cadence. SpaceX has bet that stressing Starship to its limits—as it did on Flight 12 and other missions—will eliminate future hiccups, with the tradeoff being more frequent groundings. If SpaceX can launch Flight 13 this week, the less than two-month turnaround from the prior mission would be a significant improvement. At the same time, delays are stacking up. What Went Wrong? Starship Flight 12 was a mixed bag. On one hand, the rocket successfully reached orbit, deployed 20 "dummy" Starlink satellites, and splashed down within a predetermined zone in the Indian Ocean. On the other, the ship lost one of its six Raptor engines, and the Super Heavy booster did not behave as predicted. Due to the booster anomaly, the FAA activated a debris response area (DRA) that placed five aircraft in holding patterns and delayed six departures. The mission was critical as the debut of Starship V3, which is expected to be capable of larger Starlink deployments than SpaceX's Falcon 9 or Falcon Heavy rockets. Compared to the V2 spacecraft, it has lower mass but more thrust—enough to carry 100 metric tons of payload to LEO, according to CEO Elon Musk. Further enhancements to the ship will enable orbital docking and propellant transfer, which in the future could open up commercial or NASA lunar missions. For those trips, Starship would need to fuel up at an orbital propellant depot due to its massive size and the power required to get it to the moon. That is the Starship HLS' planned profile for NASA's Artemis IV lunar landing scheduled for 2028, should the space agency select it over Blue Origin's Blue Moon HLS. The FAA said Monday that it accepted SpaceX's assessment of the booster anomaly's two most probable root causes—"heat effects on propulsion system components during the ascent and erroneous engine alarm system settings." It said there were no reports of injury or property damage and approved four corrective actions. "SpaceX can proceed with Starship Flight 13 launch operations provided all safety and other licensing requirements are met," the agency said in a statement. SpaceX over the weekend provided further clarity. It said that during Flight 12 stage separation, "slight differences in engine startup" caused a 90-degree deviation to Super Heavy's planned flip maneuver, which is intended to save fuel during the booster's descent. The vehicle's engine startup sequence has been modified, SpaceX said, to more reliably flip in the right direction. After the flip, five of the booster's 33 Raptor engines failed to relight. That brought a premature end to its boostback burn and led to a harder-than-expected splashdown. SpaceX said that the Super Heavy for Flight 13 received hardware modifications that are intended to prevent a repeat, as well as upgrades to its engine alarm and abort systems. The company also addressed the loss of one of Starship's three vacuum-optimized Raptor engines, which it said occurred about 40 seconds after stage separation. Still, the Flight 12 Starship successfully completed a flip, burn, and splashdown in the Indian Ocean. What's Next? With Flight 13, SpaceX will look to recreate the successful aspects of Flight 12 without incurring anomalies. Super Heavy's core objective is the same—a successful launch, ascent, stage separation, boostback burn, and landing burn ahead of a soft splashdown. For Starship, SpaceX aims to relight one of the vehicle's Raptor engines in space, which it failed to do on Flight 12 due to the engine loss. If the ship makes it to atmospheric reentry, the company plans to push its heat shield to the limit, as it has done before. Previous missions have experimented with different angles of attack and tile materials. For a few, SpaceX stripped heat shield tiles in certain locations to expose Starship's underbelly to maximum stress. This time, it will attach tiles to various portions of the ship to evaluate different options for the integration of catch hardware. Unlike the company's Falcon 9, which is fitted with legs, Starship and Super Heavy are designed to be snared out of the air by a pair of giant metal chopsticks at the Starbase launch pad in Texas. SpaceX does not plan to catch either stage on Flight 13, but it has successfully caught and reflown two boosters. Another change to Flight 13 is Starship's payload. This time, the Starlink satellites will be real rather than dummy versions. The satellites, which are expected to burn up about 20 minutes after being deployed, will try to connect with SpaceX's larger Starlink constellation using solar arrays and antennas. Six of the satellites are equipped with cameras that are designed to scan Starship's heat shield and beam imagery from orbit to mission control in Texas. Some heat shield tiles were painted white to simulate missing hardware and test the system's accuracy. The idea is to assess the heat shield's health before committing resources to a catch attempt. Two of the 20 dummy Starlinks deployed on Flight 12 had the same modifications and successfully collected imagery . SpaceX will stream the mission live on its website and X account, starting about 30 minutes before liftoff. Watching closely will be thousands of space enthusiasts, as well as NASA and the company's commercial customers who are depending on Starship. More anomalies could impact SpaceX's future ambitions, including landing American astronauts on the moon. NASA in June awarded a lunar cargo mission to its main rival, Blue Origin, which is vying to be the HLS provider for the Artemis IV moon landing.

VH-92A Marine One helicopter hovering over the White House lawn at sunset causing visible rotor downwash effects
Aviation SafetyJul 15, 11:51 AM

New Marine One Helicopters Cause Lawn Damage, FAA Reviews DC Crash Safety

New Sikorsky Marine One helicopters damage the White House lawn, the airports renamed for U.S. presidents, airline consolidation, DCA crash safety recommendations, controversy over ADS-B In regulations, Air France and Airbus manslaughter verdict, passengers sue Delta over turbulence injuries, a Ryanair window ruptures, and a seaplane makes a hard landing in New York's East River. Also, interviews from the Spurwink Farm fly-in. Aviation News Lockheed Martin Is Covering the Cost of Trump's White House Helipad President Trump said that Sikorsky, part of Lockheed Martin, would cover the cost of building a new helipad at the White House. Lockheed Martin confirmed the report. Sikorsky helicopters have been used to transport the president since the 1970s.  The new VH-92A Patriot helicopter has propulsion exhaust vents located toward the rear of the airframe and pointed downward, unlike the VH-3D’s configuration. Also, with much more powerful engines, the VH-92A generates significantly more downwash than the VH-3D. The hot exhaust gets combined with the intense rotor downwash at touchdown, and the combined heat-and-airflow effect scorches the turf and can physically rip sod loose. Airline consolidation now rules the skies. Has it been good for passengers? Continental Airlines, Northwest Airlines, and US Airways are gone. Spirit Airlines is gone as well. Now, the Big Four U.S. airlines control roughly three-quarters of the U.S. market. Has this been good for the flying public? It depends on who you ask. Former governor Chris Sununu, now the head of Airlines for America, said at a Capitol Hill hearing, “We have more competition per route than ever before. When I go to buy a ticket, I have four, five, or six carriers going from Wichita to Dallas. So now they’re all competing on that exact same route." There are six airlines serving Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport, but there’s only one that flies nonstop to Dallas. Past guest Ganesh Sitaraman, a professor at Vanderbilt Law School and the author of the book Why Flying Is Miserable and How to Fix It said, “From the airlines’ perspective, it makes sense. Bigger is better, and it’ll be more efficient for them, even if there’s a lot of drawbacks for communities and passengers.” A Florida airport is officially renamed for Trump. What does he stand to gain? FAA Details First Official Response to DC Crash Safety Recommendations After the January 2025 midair collision near Washington, D.C., that killed 67 people, the NTSB issued nearly three dozen recommendations. As is always the case, the FAA is not obligated to implement the NTSB’s recommendations. Earlier this year, the FAA said it had fully addressed seven of the recommendations and that it would evaluate the others, with further updates to come by May 31, 2027. The Air Current reported that the FAA indicated it is evaluating whether the number of arrivals permitted per hour at DCA is appropriate. This is a key metric that the NTSB said contributed to the airport’s congestion at the time of the crash. Also, any adjustments will be determined after an official analysis in 2027. This $50,000 Safety Fix Is Dividing the Aviation Industry and Washington This could be characterized as a conference-committee fight over how strong an ADS-B In mandate should be, not whether there will be one. ALPA and NTSB are on one side (ROTOR Act), and industry groups like A4A/AOPA/NBAA on the other (ALERT) side.  Senate: ROTOR Act (Rotorcraft Operations Transparency and Oversight Reform Act) Would require all aircraft to be equipped with ADS-B In and repeal certain military exemptions from the technology requirements. Passed the Senate by unanimous consent in December, with strong support, including from ALPA. The House rejected it on February 24, 2026, falling one vote short of the two-thirds majority needed after the Defense Department raised national security concerns House: ALERT Act (Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act) House lawmakers revised the bill to explicitly include an ADS-B In mandate after the earlier version was criticized for failing to clearly require it. The updated version requires that aircraft carry both ADS-B In and ACAS X (Airborne Collision Avoidance System X), integrated so ADS-B In data feeds the alerting function. Opposition: ALPA doesn’t endorse it, arguing that ACAS Xa (the large-commercial-aircraft variant) isn’t yet commercialized, that no integration standards exist, and that the system suppresses alerts below 1,000 feet when situational awareness matters most. The NTSB also declined to support it, saying it falls short of requiring ADS-B In for all aircraft operating in airspace where ADS-B Out is already required, even though it allows compliance via portable receivers with line-of-sight limitations. Air France and Airbus found guilty of manslaughter over 2009 plane crash A Paris Appeals Court found Air France and Airbus “solely and entirely responsible” for the 2009 AF447 accident, which killed 228 people when it crashed into the Atlantic Ocean. The companies were cleared in April 2023 but were found guilty after an eight-week trial. Both Air France and Airbus have denied the charges and say they will appeal. In 2012, French investigators found a combination of technical failure involving ice in the pitot tubes and pilot confusion over faulty air-speed readings. Pilot training has since been modified, and pitot tube sensors have been replaced. 20 Sue Delta Over 2.5 Minutes of Terror on Flight Out of Utah A lawsuit has been filed against Delta Air Lines on behalf of 20 passengers of Delta Flight 56, claiming that pilots “recklessly flew” too close to thunderstorms, where severe turbulence caused multiple injuries. The turbulence lasted 2 1/2 minutes over Wyoming, and the flight was diverted to Minnesota. Twenty-five people were transported to local hospitals. The NTSB said the pilots were caught by surprise. In the lawsuit, the plaintiffs allege that the National Weather Service issued an advisory warning that turbulent conditions were present in the mountains east of Salt Lake City and that thunderstorms were present along portions of the flight path. Apparent engine fan blade failure preceded rupture of Ryanair 737 window The Air Current reports that the rupture of a Ryanair Boeing 737-800 window resulted from a fan blade failure on the right CFM56-7B engine. Fan blade failures are serious but rare. Aircraft engines are designed to contain fan blade failures and are tested during the certification process.  The FAA issued airworthiness directives to mitigate the risk of fan blade failure through inspections and an engine inlet redesign to ensure containment. The FAA set a July 31, 2028, deadline for compliance. Small plane makes hard landing into New York's East River, officials say A Kodiak 100 seaplane with eight people on board made a hard landing in the East River between Brooklyn and Manhattan. There was "substantial damage" to the plane, but there were no injuries. The plane bounced three times, and the pilot subsequently told the passengers that a pontoon had broken. A pattern of progressive porpoise leading to structural failure appears in NTSB seaplane accident reports across various types, including Cessna 206 and 208 Caravan floatplanes, de Havilland Beavers, and Twin Otters on floats. A few East River/urban seaplane-specific factors that might be in play: Wake and chop from harbor traffic (ferries, tour boats) create a much less predictable water surface than open lake/bay operations. Confined approach corridors near Skyport limit go-around and abort options if the pilot senses a bad touchdown developing. The area has had at least one other recent seaplane mishap (a two-seater damaged by a wave three weeks prior), suggesting water-surface conditions have been a recurring operational challenge

The Daily Touch & Go

The day's best aviation news in your inbox. Free, no spam.